According to Brent Budowski, Paul will win tonight’s debate. He writes:

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) will win tonight’s big Republican debate because he will be the only candidate discussing serious ideas in a Republican field that is one of the weakest in modern presidential politics.

Since most Republican candidates with a chance to win are not participating in tonight’s debate, it will be a test of former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty. My guess is that Pawlenty will be trying to appease various Republicans while Dr. Paul will be clearly advocating his ideas and will win the battle of the sound bites after the formal debate has ended.

<>оптимизация ов под гугл

Read more

This is a terrific illustration of the false premises of American foreign policy.

Read more

http://dailypaul.com/163667/tim-pawlenty-and-ron-paul-are-officially-running-for-president

Tim Pawlenty and Ron Paul are officially presidential candidates.

Both formed “exploratory committees” in the previous month and a half, for the purpose of exploring the possibilities of candidacy.

Both have filed for presidential candidacy in South Carolina — a requirement for participating in the first GOP primary debate of the 2012 election cycle, cohosted in Greenville, S.C., by Fox News and the South Carolina Republican Party.

And both candidates were aware that, by doing so, they have officially become presidential candidates in the eyes of the law. Spokesmen for both Pawlenty and Paul acknowledged that filing for candidacy in South Carolina changes their bosses’ status in the eyes of the Federal Election Commission.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/05/tim-pawl…<>заказать контекстную рекламураскрутка ов хабаровск

Read more

I have stated this several times, but Paul Mulshine states it better:

If Ron…were to run, he’d have a ready audience in all of those tea-party people whose movement got its start with [Paul’s Dec. 16, 2007] money bomb. The tea-party types actually like listening to lectures about fiscal responsibility. Early in the 2008 campaign, Paul seemed to bore even his base with all that talk about the Federal Reserve. It sounded esoteric.

Once the financial bubble burst, though, monetary policy was a hot topic among conservatives. Throw in trillion-dollar deficits and the Fed’s policy of “quantitative easing” in the years since, and suddenly every candidate’s sounding like that guy who was denouncing the Fed in Philly four years ago.

And consider this quote on foreign policy: “We shouldn’t go to war so carelessly. When we do, the wars don’t end.”

Did Haley Barbour say that just the other day? Probably. But Ron said it first, in that Fox News debate four years ago when the Republicans were ready to run him out of town on a rail. That same rail will be a crowded one this year. And I for one can’t wait to see who is on it.

<>контекстная реклама цена

Read more

Paul’s response Tuesday, during an interview with Fox Business network, reiterated his opinion held for many years that the US should not be involved in overseas wars, and questioned why the campaign to bring Bin Laden to justice for the September 11th terrorist attacks took ten years, 6000 casualties, and more than $1 trillion to complete, summarizing the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, begun since the 9/11 attacks masterminded by Bin Laden. He did not credit the death to Obama nor Bush, and said that “”If we got him, I guess it’s time to come home as far as I’m concerned.” Paul, an avid advocate of the removal of US military from the Middle East conflicts, also commented that he would vote against any further foreign aid to the nation of Pakistan, much in line with his record against foreign assistance.The Texas Representative also stated that he was worried about the safety of the United States in the aftermath of Bin Laden’s death, and that the lack of evidence provided after the attack Sunday would inspire conspiracy theories. According to an AFP report provided by Yahoo News,  Pakistani citizens were seen outside the gates of Bin Laden’s compound dressed as the terrorist and as Taliban leader Mullah Omar, cheering and shouting “Osama is alive!” mocking the US because they do not believe that Bin Laden was living and operating inside their city limits.

<>положение а в поисковой системе

Read more

North concludes:

Doug Casey calls this the forever war. It therefore is the forever deficit — “forever” meaning “until the Federal government goes bankrupt.”

Not forever.

Sooner than the voters think.

http://www.garynorth.com/public/7965.cfm<>контентная реклама

Read more

Read more

Raimondo asks an important question:

It took us ten years, and trillions of dollars, to track down and eliminate a single man. Although we eventually got our man, who was the real winner in this battle?

<>заказать статью вак

Read more

http://www.dailypaul.com/163456/shortened-no-more-liars-video-60-seconds<>online game mobileпроверка посещаемости а онлайн

Read more

Anthony Gregory’s piece is thoughtful as usual. Read the entire article.

Hundreds of thousands of innocents have died years before their time. Tens of thousands of American soldiers have been killed, maimed and psychologically scarred for life. Priceless liberties have been trashed. The United States has waged military operations, major and minor, in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, and Libya. Trillions of dollars in resources have been squandered and destroyed.

<>online games rpgпродвижение а раскрутка процесс

Read more