Solomon writes Proverbs to his son, the king-in-waiting. Rehoboam was the son that succeeded Solomon on the throne, so it is safe to assume that he was a primary focus. A common thread between both father and son is that neither lived up to the wisdom encouraged in Proverbs. Solomon warned his son about Harlot Folly with all her wiles, yet he allowed women to turn his heart from Yahweh (1 Kg 11:1-3). Rehoboam was taught to listen to the aged, yet he took the counsel of his peers, a sort of power-hungry gang of blood-thirsty tyrants as described in Proverbs 1. What happened? How could Solomon, of all people, who prayed for and was granted wisdom by God, turn from that wisdom to live as he did?
Since teaching through Proverbs, I have been asked this question several times. I don’t have all the answers, but I will venture to answer the best I can. The first answer has to do with a theological theme that runs through Scripture, and the second has to do with man’s fallen nature.
One prevalent theme in Scripture is the inadequacy of everything in the old creation under Adam. Everything from the time of the fall up to the time of Jesus is anticipatory, a type and shadow that looks to its substance in Christ (Col 2:17). Types and shadows aren’t evil, but they are weak because of the flesh, fallen humanity (Rom 8:1-3). God’s Law, for instance, is a type and shadow. The Law of God is perfect. It is holy and just and good (Rom 7:12). However, the Law is powerless to ultimately cure the death of sin through the needed resurrection life (Gal 3:21). The Law is good; it is good as it reflects the character of God and remains useful for us, but it is inadequate because it was not created to bring the promised life.
(more…)
Read more