In the next few weeks, colleges across the country will commence their Fall semester. Many students who grew up in Christian homes will consciously trade in their faith for a philosophical system antithetical to the one of their upbringing. Even more students, however, while not outright denying their Christian faith, will unconsciously adopt a philosophical system that is inherently idolatrous. Itâs not that this second group wants to be idolaters; they simply lack the tools to discern the nature of the bill of goods their professor is selling them.
So, how can one know if a given philosophical system (Kantianism, Marxism, Platonism, etc.) is idolatrous? One can begin by asking two questions. First, âis this logical?â Second, âis this sinful?â If the answer is âyesâ to the first question, the answer will be ânoâ to the second question. If the answer is ânoâ to the first question, the answer will be âyesâ to the second question. Hereâs a story to illustrate the point:
On her twenty first birthday, Cindy was promised a night on the town with her girlfriends. After dinner, her friends came to her house in a limo, blindfolded her, and took her to Crazy Daveâs Casino (obviously, she had some pretty lame friendsâĤ). As they were getting into the limo, they shoved some bills in her purse and said âtonightâs on us!â Once inside, Cindy took off her blindfold. Because there was no signage on the inside of the building, Cindy still wasnât sure where she was. Eventually, she saw a waitress and asked if she could get something to drink. As she pulled out her wallet to pay, she saw four hundred Crazy Daveâs Casino-Bucks in her purse.
Now, there are only two ways that Cindy could have deduced her location. First, she could have spotted a logo. While itâs true the big Crazy Daveâs sign was outside, there were actually logoâs on the slot machines, napkins, etc. Secondly, of course, she couldâve known by looking at the Crazy Daveâs Casino-Bucks. Her currency couldâve revealed to her the location. Likewise, her location could have told her what sort of currency her friends slipped into her purse. For Cindy to answer the question âam I at Casino Daveâs?â sheâd have to look at her currency. For her to answer the question âwhat sort of currency do I have in my purse?â sheâd have to look at the signage.
Back to our original question: how can one know if a given philosophical system is idolatrous? There are at least two ways: Firstly, you can look for signage. Here, youâre trying to determine if the system outrightly advertises itself as sinful. Put simply, this means asking a couple questions of the philosophical system. One question is, âdoes it enable me to do something God forbids?â Nihilism, for instance, enables one to tear down systems for âtearing’sâ sake. Well, some systems need to be torn down, but weâre commanded to obey Godâs rule. Any tearing, then, must not be for its own sake, but because weâre seeking a system patterned after the rule of God.
Thus, we know Nihilism is idolatrous because it enables us to do something God forbids. Another question to ask is, âdoes the system forbid me from doing something God commands?â Animism, for instance, is idolatrous because it teaches that everything on the earth, indeed the earth itself, has a soul. Thus, Iâm forbidden from, among other things, giving thanks to God. If âMother Natureâ is giving me food, my thanksgiving is directed to the object Iâm eating rather than the One who gave me the object to eat. Like Cindy, youâre in a building (the Casino of Idolatry, if you will), and youâre looking for clues as to the nature of the structure.
Secondly, you can look at the currency in which the philosophical system deals. This is crucial because not all philosophical systems are easily detected as âsinful.â Like Cindy in the casino, there isnât a big Crazy Daveâs sign, and the logos are quite small and inconspicuous. Thus, it wonât do to simply ask âam I in the Casino of Idolatry?â Rather, youâll have to ask âam I using the currency of the Casino of Idolatry?â
Well, what is the currency of idolatry? In a word, itâs illogicality. If the system is illogical, it is idolatrous. Idolatry is always making a deal in which you trade life for death; the family blessing for some soup. An idolatrous philosophical system never uses the currency of âlogic.â Thus, one can ask the question, âAre the propositions which this philosophy proposes logical?â If the answer is âno!â then you can know the system is itself idolatrous. With a little deductive reasoning, one can find idolatry in any illogical statement. Likewise, one can find incoherence in any given expression of idolatry.
Take, for example, the illogicality of Kantianism. In his book on logic (a wonderful resource for any incoming freshman!), Vern Poythress shows how the system is self-defeating (i.e. illogical):
“Kantianism uses reason to build a system that sets the limits of reason. To do so, it has to survey the field. It has to transcend the phenomenal and look at the noumenal realm as well. It has to take a Godâs-eye view. This view, once achieved, afterwards allows it to tell you and me the narrower limits in which our reason can safely operate. The Godâs-eye view is Kantianismâs secret, and simultaneously its weakest point. Kantianism is self-destructive. In its results, it tells us what are the limitations of reason. If we take those results seriously, we have to apply them to Kantianismâs own reasonings about philosophy. Those reasonings go beyond the limits, and so we conclude that they are not sound.”
Faith is not antithetical to critical reasoning. In fact, faith offers the freshman the tools by which she can fully engage the whole of reality, physical and metaphysical. Or, to stick with our illustration, the biblical faith offers a currency backed by the Creator of the whole world. Thus, spendable not only in “religion class” but in philosophy, art history, economics, and science. Go, then, freshman: study with confidence! Indeed, study in faith.