Author

By In Church

The Offense of the Gospel

There is no way around it; there is no shortcut to escape it unless you want to forsake it, but the Gospel offends. You must drink it straight. For the Christian, the alternative to living out a Gospel that offends is to live as if the Gospel does not matter. We can move through our workday cavalierly playing the nominal Christian game, remaining quiet when you should have stood firm; you can let Uncle Joe splurt his vitriol against the church and be a good girl, not causing offense anywhere, just like the Apostle Paul (II Cor. 11:25), right? Is it or is it not the power of God unto salvation and foolishness to the world (Rom. 1; I Cor. 1)? The way you live is a determiner of one of these two choices.

So, how do we intentionally live a Gospel that touches the core of anthropology? That hits the center of human pride? That strikes at the root of secular practice? The first way to live a Gospel that offends, that is foolishness to the world is to practice those Christian rituals that birthed the Christ-community in the first century. And they were the “foolish” rituals of hospitality, friendship, and sacraments. The Early Church had many failures, but they hosted each other, they loved each other, and they ate the Lord’s Supper with each other. And those practices toppled an empire. How is that for a Gospel offense?!

If the cultural forces continue to move away from the authentic values of the Church, members will have to see the community of Christ as an alternative city fully ready to provide counter-cultural measures that build the Church once again. This is no time to rest or to play nice with anti-christian politicians and lawmakers. We will have to restore our sense of the good by loving one another and surrounding ourselves with a Creed that cannot be torn by the mobs but is embraced by a genuine community of believers. We must return to those principles which formed us into the unstoppable empire that grew from 12 to billions. We need to declare these things loud and clear.

“We believe in God the Father Almighty!” but they will say, “How dare you!”

“Maker of Heaven of Earth!” but they will say, “That’s not science!”

“And in Jesus Christ our Lord!” and they will say, “That’s not diversity.”

“Who shall come to judge the living and the dead!” and they will retort, “Nobody can judge!”

Every time we get together for coffee, eat with our neighbor, talk about the goodness of God, and practice holy habits, we live the Gospel in word and deed. We are embracing a different creed than the world’s rules.

No, there is no way around it. The Gospel offends! It afflicts the comfortable and comforts the afflicted. Any other message is false and has no power or salvation.

Read more

By In Podcast

Episode 102, Trinitarian Formation

Our evangelical churches stress the importance of discipleship. It is good and necessary. But discipleship is often discussed in the context of intellectual learning; a fact-finding mission. However, there is more to discipleship than facts. Discipleship in the Bible is also the cultivation of bodily postures and biblical manners. The Bible trains us to move and live and to have our being in God. Any model of discipleship that does not include learning to kneel, raise hands, eat, sing, show affection, speak gently, receive, give, sit, stand, etc. is missing the mark. We need to school our imagination by seeing discipleship as more than biblical data but biblical living.

Our guest on this episode is Chase Davis. He is the lead pastor of the Well Church in Denver, Colorado. He is the author of Trinitarian Formation: A Theology of Discipleship.

Follow Chase on Twitter

Purchase his book.

Read more

By In Church

The Case Against Neo-AnaBaptists

In the revival of conservative politics and theonomic ethics, the danger is that evangelicals eager to see all things made new will capitulate to theological formulations that are more akin to Anabaptist rituals in practice and worship.

But the return to proper rituals and rightly dividing of the Law-Word does not mean a return to a Victorian past but a movement to a vibrant future. We incorporate past habits, styles, and paradigms by rightly absorbing them into our new world; adapting the parapet to protection around the pool (Deut. 22:8).

The Schleitheim Confession of Anabaptist religion should not be a model for those in the Reformed tradition seeking this cultural and political reformation. The attempt to disassociate from the world by forming isolated colonies leaves the church unprepared and naked before our enemies. Instead of providing a strong refuge for people, it serves as an escape world.

James Jordan’s emphasis on historical movement from land to sea; or land to metropolis is the right one. We are called to engage/be with/in the presence of/ the polis. Yet, many have adopted a neo-anabaptist paradigm. Chestertonian localism is good only insofar as the locale becomes the center of ecclesial life rather than an attempt to hide. As Peter Leithart observes: “Jesus doesn’t call us to be copers. We aren’t survivalists. We aren’t to beat a retreat. “

Generally, this plays out in the evangelical tendency towards externalized practices that differentiate Christians from unbelievers, other Christians, and Christians even within our tribes. I am describing a theological formulation that is not content with basic biblical imperatives but rather delves into extra layers of differentiation.

Under worship, this may play out in tendencies against instrumentation or excessive emphasis on preaching to the detriment of the liturgy (identifying liturgical practices as too Roman Catholic; pitting word against sacrament) and a fundamental pursuit of novelty in worship patterns identifying the structure as too cumbersome.

Anabaptism–theologically and historically–is a distancing from good, material things, despising the gifts of God in technology, industry, plentifulness, & McDonald’s (I Tim. 6:17). The solution is not to look different for the sake of looking different but to act differently for the sake of changing society’s rituals.

For an additional follow-up, see my post.

Read more

By In Podcast, Theology

Episode 101, R.C. Sproul and His Legacy

When I was in the heights of ignorance somewhere in my glorious teens, a radio show emerged on my station on a snowy evening in Altoona, PA. “Renewing Your Mind” with R.C. Sproul dramatically shaped my theological pursuits. I wasn’t fully on board with the fanatic Pittsburg Steelers fan by the name of Robert Charles Sproul, but I knew he was on to something.

My joy was made complete during my seminary days in RTS/Orlando where we had the opportunity to attend St. Andrew Chapel for a short season and sit under his preaching and also his classes on the Westminster Confession on Wednesday nights. I had the pleasure of interacting with R.C. on many occasions, but the memory of watching that titan preach from his Lutheraneque pulpit is something I will never forget. When I came across a new biography of Sproul, who died in 2017, I had to contact the author. And it’s my delight to have Nate Pickowicz discuss his book: R.C. Sproul – Defender of the Reformed Faith.

In this episode, we discussed:

*the educational background that gave roots to the genius of R.C. Sproul

* major theological issues that shaped R.C. theological ministry

…and many other topics.

You can purchase Nate’s book here: https://www.amazon.com/R-C-Sproul-Def…

You can follow Nate on twitter: https://twitter.com/NatePickowicz

Read more

By In Theology

Postmillennialism for Dummies

One of the joys of speaking loudly around here is that I get to see some fine china broken in real-time. That’s a metaphor for views being shattered and replaced by something else, for those of you just tuning in.

The thing broken is a variation of pessimistic eschatology and it is being replaced with some happy, hopeful, and hosannah postmillennialism. Mind you, I am not so much concerned about the loyalty to the systematic category, but to the heart of the matter. Because es-cha-to-lo-gy has consequences for casuistry. Say that three times.

It pleases me to see folks going through that radical transformation and sending me notes about it. Just this last week, two brothers texted me separated by 30 minutes sharing with me their newfound dogmatism for stout-beer postmillennialism. And the good news is that they didn’t come into it half-heartedly. They did the hard work of research, reading, and repeating. It is an amazing thing to plant seeds for a long time, only to see them bear fruit much later. God seems to work like that on many occasions. I believe we are reaching a stage of massive theological conversions, and I have alluded to some of these factors before, but the postmil conversion is a fruitful blossoming of many seeds planted long ago.

I have been harping on the postmil “C” chord for a really long time and I think postmil eschatology is beginning to see a resurgence. This may be the result of ecclesiastical behaviors these past two years. In fact, I will go so far as to say that the churches who have been pushing against shut-downs and sundry silliness have postmil bones. Now, lots of other non-postmil flocks have come alongside our efforts, or later decided to peek behind the curtain, but the reality is that the majority of pastors I know who decided to fight the tide named one of their kids or their dogs, B.B. Warfield.

(more…)

Read more

By In Podcast

Episode 100 of the KC Podcast: The Failed Church: Restoring a Vision of Ecclesial Victory

In our 100th episode, we spoke with the founder of the Center for Cultural Leadership, P. Andrew Sandlin. Sandlin is editor and contributor to a new work that challenges head-on the many failures of the evangelical church during the COVID season.

I truly believe that these essays will be a tremendous source of wisdom and insight in the days to come. I was honored to contribute a chapter to it and hope that you will order copies for your congregation and book studies. These essays can be studied individually, which will provoke a sturdy dose of conversations within the Church and the home.

Read more

By In Church

What is Pentecost Sunday?

Many Christians know little about the Church Calendar, which means that many evangelicals will treat this Sunday like any other day. But this Sunday marks the beginning of the “Ordinary Season” (not in the mundane or common sense, but the term comes from the word “ordinal,” which means “counted time”). This season–called the season of Pentecost (or Trinity Season) is composed of 23-28 Sundays, and it fleshes out the mission of the Church. It begins tomorrow and continues all the way to November 26th. To put it simply, Pentecost is the outworking of the mission of Jesus through his people by the power of the Spirit. The Pentecost Season emphasizes the unleashing of the Spirit’s work and power through the Bride of Jesus Christ, the Church.

Liturgically, many congregations wear red as a symbol of the fiery-Spirit that befell the Church (Acts 2). The Season brings with it a renewed emphasis on the Church as the central institution to the fulfillment of God’s plans in history. As such, it brings out the practical nature of Christian theology. Joan Chittister defines Pentecost as “the period of unmitigated joy, of total immersion in the implications of what it means to be a Christian, to live a Christian life” (The Liturgical Year, 171).

The evangelical church has offered a Spiritlessness teaching and worship. We have acted afraid of the mighty rushing wind for fear of its mystical presence. However, Pentecost exhorts us to be spiritual (Spirit-led) while emphasizing the titanic involvement of the Third Person of the Trinity in beautifying the world to reflect the glory of the Father and the Son. We must worship Spirit-led and in truth (Jn. 4:24).

The Spirit is crucial to the forming and re-forming of any environment. It communicates our thoughts, emotions, and prayers to our Meditator. The Third Person of the Trinity emotionalizes rightly and intercedes on our behalf in the midst of our ignorance (Rom. 8:26-30). Further, the Spirit draws individuals (John 6:44) to enter into one baptized community of faith. The Spirit, in the words of James Jordan, is the “divine match-maker.” He brings isolated individuals into a Pentecostalized body, a body that has many parts, but one Head.

So, let us embrace this Season! Let us join this cosmic Pentecostal movement and embrace the mission of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.

Read more

By In Church, Family and Children, Worship

What is the Ascension of our Lord?

The Church celebrates the Ascension of our Lord today. Since most churches are not able to have Thursday services, traditionally, many of them celebrate Ascension on Sunday. But in our day, the Ascension of Jesus is barely mentioned in the evangelical vocabulary. We make room for his birth, death, and resurrection, but we tend to put a period where God puts a comma.

If the resurrection was the beginning of Jesus’ enthronement, then the ascension is the establishment of his enthronement. The Ascension activates Christ’s victory in history. The Great Commission is only relevant because of the Ascension. Without the Ascension, the call to baptize and disciple the nations would be meaningless. It is on the basis of Jesus’ enthronement at the right-hand of the Father that we image-bearers can de-throne rulers through the power and authority of our Great Ruler, Jesus Christ.

The Ascension then is a joyful event, because it is the genesis of the Church’s triumph over the world. Further, it defines us as a people of glory and power, not of weakness and shame. As Jesus is ascended, we too enter into his ascension glory (Col. 3:1) This glory exhorts us to embrace full joy. As Alexander Schmemann once wrote:

“The Church was victorious over the world through joy…and she will lose the world when she loses its joy… Of all accusations against Christians, the most terrible one was uttered by Nietzsche when he said that Christians had no joy.”

A joy-less Christian faith is a faith that has not ascended. Where Christ is we are. And we know that Jesus is at the right hand of the Father. He is ruling and reigning from his heavenly throne. The Father has given him the kingdom (Psalm 2), and now he is preserving, progressing, and perfecting his kingdom. He is bringing all things under subjection (I Cor. 15:24-26).

We know that when he was raised from the dead, Jesus was raised bodily. But Gnostic thinking would have us assume that since Jesus is in heaven he longer needs a physical body. But the same Father who raised Jesus physically, also has his Son sitting beside him in a physical body. As one author observed:

“Jesus has gone before us in a way we may follow through the Holy Spirit whom he has sent, because the way is in his flesh, in his humanity.”

Our Lord is in his incarnation body at the right hand of the Father. This has all sorts of implications for us in worship. We are worshipping a God/Man; one who descended in human flesh and who ascended in human flesh. He is not a disembodied spirit. He is truly God and truly man.

As we consider and celebrate the Ascension of our blessed Lord, remember that you are worshiping the One who understands your needs because he has a body just like you and he rejoices with you because he has a body just like you.

Read more

By In Scribblings

Abraham Kuyper and Common Grace

During the COVID era, I had the opportunity to deliver a few talks via zoom to men’s groups around the country on the legacy of Abraham Kuyper. One of the prevailing themes of these talks was a hearty focus on Kuyper’s doctrine of common grace.

Kuyper made a distinction between special grace and common grace. “Special grace” had to do with church life (ecclesiastical matters) and “common grace” focused on things pertaining to culture and society. Kuyper believed that post-reformational theology focused almost exclusively on “special grace.” The basic features of their controversies dealt with the sacraments, church architecture, church polity, and issues regarding the clergy. Now, to be clear, the Reformers did deal with issues outside the church, but because they were fighting and continued to fight church/liturgical abuses in the 16th century, those topics carried the day.

When Kuyper comes on the scene in the 19th century, he’s living in a day of cultural confusion. He doesn’t think the church is preparing men and women to do their jobs well in the culture. Thus, Kuyper develops this robust view of grace that focuses on the Christian’s contributions to society as image-bearers. If you are a painter, how do your painting skills reflect God’s grace? If you are a politician, how are you applying your Christian faith to particular agendas? You may say it was the outworking of the cobbler’s paradigm in Luther’s reformation.

Kuyper wanted to see how the Christian faith would be applied to public theology. Dutch scholars at the time thought the doctrine of common grace was absolutely ridiculous and considered worldly by many. He even argued that unbelievers contributed certain graces to society that Christians should enjoy, take and transform (Matt. 5:45; Luke 6:35).

The entire endeavor opened a new vista to public theologians seeking to incorporate biblical thought into society. If God has bestowed upon mankind good gifts, then mankind is indebted to the Creator God. There is mutuality, an exchange of blessings between God and man. God grants and men return thanks with offerings. Even unbelievers participate in such gift-giving despite their unbelief. They may assert that they are not offering such blessings, but their inventions and their opinations on the plague of transgenderism (thanks Bill Maher!) offer the church greater confidence in her labors.

Common grace does not act contrary to special grace; common grace validates special grace. It strengthens societally what is already true ecclesiastically.

Read more

By In Culture

Phil Vischer, Veggie Tales, and the Nuance of Abortion

I know I am a rebel here, but Veggie Tales was a pontification in silliness. For a series of evangelical cliches, the show provided an enormous amount of basic morality without the ethos of Jael. That show and a series of other unfortunate events in the sterilization of the evangelical mind provided the stimulation for an unobjective Christendom among young evangelicals where everything is up for debate and dogma becomes heretical.

Phil Vischer–the storyteller behind Veggie Tales–has emerged as the most vocal proponent of what I have called, “sophisticated footnoting.” He thrives in nuances and caveats and oh! the complexities of this whole darn thing of abortion.

Think about it: these last two years have been the most magnified sight into the devious and devilish devices of Democrat powers and evan-gelly leaders. They have sought to endanger our health, history, and hope. They have tortured the American conscience by putting friends against friends at the Thanksgiving table; they have filled the cup of wrath by instilling fear as a commodity and currency. Democrats–both pagans and Bud-Light evangelical varieties–offer misery and betrayal to morality and classical mores and yet, Phil, wants to find common ground.

Image
(more…)

Read more