Ron Paul is changing the Republican Party more so than the Republicans want to realize.–Juan Williams
<>The Dirty Old Man and the IMF
Saturday was a bad day for the New World Order.
New York police boarded the first-class cabin of an Air France jet bound for Paris to collar Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the head of the International Monetary Fund, a Grand Master of the Universe and the Socialist Party’s hope to defeat President Nicolas Sarkozy in 2012.
Strauss-Kahn, or DSK as he is known, was hauled back to New York and identified in a police lineup by an African maid at the Sofitel hotel as the man who emerged stark naked from the bathroom of his $3,000-a-night suite and tried to rape her.
DSK’s political allies are howling entrapment. Yet his rap sheet is long. Called the Great Seducer, he was charged with the sexual harassment of a co-worker at the IMF and accused by a young French novelist of behaving like a “rutting chimpanzee” and trying to rape her when she contacted him about a book she was writing in 2002.
The novelist, Tristan Banon, now 31, is a goddaughter to DSK’s second wife. She took a lawyer’s advice not to file charges then. But, says the Guardian, Banon is about to file them now.
Monday, The New York Times wrote, “As the impact of Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s predicament hit home, others, including some in the news media, began to reveal accounts, long suppressed or anonymous, of what they called Mr. Strauss-Kahn’s previously predatory behavior toward women and his aggressive sexual pursuit of them, from students and journalists to subordinates.”
What is this satyr doing running the IMF? How was a man of his Eurotrash reputation approved by the United States government? Such conduct may be pooh-poohed over the pond, but has our country dropped that low?
As is not infrequently the case, Rep. Ron Paul nails it: “These are the kind of people running the IMF, and we want to turn the world’s finances and the control of the money supply (over) to them?”
Indeed, there are issues here far beyond the corruption of character that drives aging compulsive lechers to criminality when their prey resist.
One of those issues is: Why is the IMF still being funded by the United States?
With the World Bank, the IMF was birthed at Bretton Woods, N.H., in 1944. In the monetary order established there, the U.S. dollar would be tied to gold, and the free world’s currencies would be tied to the dollar, all at fixed rates of exchange.
All would contribute funds in their own currency to the IMF. America would make the largest contribution. As its birthday gift, Uncle Sam gave the IMF 103 million ounces of gold.
When member nations faced balance-of-payments problems and had to devalue, the IMF would tide them over with bridge loans. The loans would be repaid as the troubled nations’ reduced exchange rate led to rising exports and reduced imports.
The system worked until 1971, when through a series of guns-and-butter budgets during Vietnam, the world acquired an immense pile of excess dollars. The British decided to cash in several billion for U.S. gold.
No way, said President Nixon. He slammed the gold window shut, cut the dollar loose and let it float against the world’s currencies. The Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates was dead. And the IMF, established to maintain it, should have died with it.
It did not, for as Ronald Reagan reminded us, the closest we come to eternal life on this earth is a government program.
For 40 years, the IMF has soldiered on, backed by both parties, plying its new trade — endless transfers of U.S. and Western wealth to bail out failing non-Western and anti-Western nations.
Under DSK, the IMF took on a new role that enchanted Europe.
It joined with the European Central Bank to provide hundreds of billions to bail out Greece, Ireland and Portugal, so these nations would not default on their debts and bring down the European banks that are stuffed full of Greek, Irish and Portuguese bonds.
Through the IMF, U.S. taxpayers are bailing out European nations to save European banks, just as U.S. taxpayers, through the Federal Reserve, secretly bailed out European banks throughout 2009 and 2010.
This is why the socialist Strauss-Kahn was a hero in the capitals of Europe. He was their agent in our capital.
Consider the winners and losers of this globalist racket.
The people of Greece, Ireland and Portugal endure austerity and recession for years, while the European banks are assured 100 cents on the dollar for their bonds. And the deal-makers like DSK are put up at $3,000-a-night hotel rooms, fly first class and get tax-free salaries larger than those of the president of the United States, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer.
Saturday at the Sofitel, we saw up-close the sense of arrogance and entitlement such privilege induces in our global elite.
Time to shut down the IMF and get back what’s left of our gold.
<>
Ron Paul and NPR
Go to any Ron Paul event and it strikes you immediately: What’s up with all the young people?
The 75-year-old Texas congressman packs halls on college campuses. His campaign volunteers often look too young to shave. And even at a recent New York City book signing, it’s surprising how many teenagers and 20-somethings are lined up for an autograph, clutching Paul’s new book, Liberty Defined.<>
Ron Paul Announces His Run for Presidency
With the official announcement, Paul now has a long journey ahead until 2012. His poll numbers are better than expected. His followers are greater than in 08′ and his chances are actually reasonable. He has the charisma, the dedication, and the message. He will undoubtedly face all the same oppositions he had in 2008, except now he has new opponents. With the exception of Gary John, a libertarian, Paul is the only vocal opponent of America’s entangling alliances overseas. Chances are his message will begin to resonate with the American people. His words and his forceful conviction on foreign policy are sure to receive a welcome from mainstream American voters.
Key to this entire presidential race is New Hampshire. The “Live Free” state is generally libertarian and an important part of the Paul strategy.<>
John Stossel and Ron Paul
Stossel writes:
The man who likely has done more than anyone to put the libertarian philosophy of freedom and small government on the political agenda probably will make another run for the presidency: U.S. Rep. Ron Paul.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/11/john-stossel-ron-paul-libertarian-agenda-getting-respect/#ixzz1M6e1LyS8<>
Newt Gingrich and the Tea Party
This is a lengthy profile of Newt Gingrich some years ago well worth re-reading.
The Tea Parties only embrace half of the Gingrich vision, the one that ties bureaucracy and corruption around the neck of the Democratic party like a dead cat. But some of the policy proposals he’s thrown out over the years suggest that Gingrich also supports massive government spending on education, technology, high-speed trains, national parks, health care, Social Security, and a host of odd pet projects: compulsory gym class for every public-school student in America, forcing teachers to take attendance every hour, paying kids to read, even compulsory health insurance — isn’t that exactly like the “Obamacare” that drives the Tea Parties mad?
<>
Ron Paul Podcast!
I hope to re-start my Ron Paul podcast. 2007’s podcast was quite successful; attracting at one time over 500 listeners. The purpose is to offer people commentary on the latest in Paul’s presidential run, and also summarize Paul’s position on a variety of topics. Hope to do my first one in the next 10 days.<>