Books
Category

By In Books

“A Grief Observed,” by C. S. Lewis – A Review

by Marc Hays and Aaron W. Eley

GriefObservedA few years ago, I received a pile of books from a friend, several of which were works by C. S. Lewis. The fact that all of them bore my friend’s name, in the upper right-hand corner of the first page, caused his donation to seem more like a purging than a gift. As such, I inquired as to his health; he said he felt fine. No fever. No chills. I inquired as to his sanity, and he assured me that his actions stemmed from sound-reasoning. Given the nature of my two queries, I could take the former answer prima facie but have continued to this day to doubt the latter. I informed him that his name would forever remain inside the cover and that he could return to retrieve his volumes any time that he wished. If he took too long to return, however, they would become annotated copies.

One of the volumes in the stack of works by Lewis was rather thin. None of them were particularly large, but one was almost a pamphlet, bearing the title A Grief Observed. When I indicate small, I mean this book is slender enough to be read in the span of one pot of coffee, or perhaps two large cups of tea; I suppose Lewis would have preferred the tea.

My copy of A Grief Observed consists of 76 pages organized into 4 chapters. The book is a chronological progression of Lewis’ state of mind as he grieved over the loss of his wife, Joy, to cancer. In the Foreword, Madeleine L’Engle relates the fact that “when C. S. Lewis married Joy Davidson, it was a pretty certain expectation that she would die first, unless there was an unexpected accident, for she was in the hospital. He knew that he was marrying a woman who was dying of cancer.” She went into a period of remission which allowed them an extended period of time as a married couple, but in the end, their marriage was comparably short.

In the introduction, Douglas H. Gresham, Lewis’ stepson, states,

Anything entitled ‘Grief Observed’ would have to be so general and nonspecific as to be academic in its approach and thus of little use to anyone approaching or experiencing bereavement.

This book on the other hand, is a stark recounting of one man’s studied attempts to come to grips with and in the end defeat the emotional paralysis of the most shattering grief of his life.

What makes A Grief Observed even more remarkable is that the author was an exceptional man, and the woman whom he mourns, an exceptional woman. Both of them were writers, both were committed Christians, but here the similarities end. It fascinates me how God sometimes brings people together who are so far apart, in so many ways, and merges them into that spiritual homogeneity which is marriage.

In the first portion of the final chapter, Lewis discusses his reasons for cataloging his thoughts into a written work:

In so far as this record was a defence against total collapse, it has done some good. The other end I had in view turns out to have been based on a misunderstanding. I thought I could describe a state; make a map of sorrow. Sorrow, however, turns out to be not a state but a process. It needs not a map but a history, and if I don’t stop writing that history at some quite arbitrary point, there’s no reason why I should ever stop. There is something new to be chronicled every day. Grief is like a long valley, a winding valley where any bend may reveal a totally new landscape. As I’ve already noted, not every bend does. Sometimes the surprise is the opposite one; you are presented with exactly the same sort of country you thought you had left behind miles ago. That is when you wonder whether the valley isn’t a circular trench. But it isn’t. There are partial recurrences, but the sequence doesn’t repeat.

If you’ve ever wished that you could sit down and have a conversation with a truly great man and ask him the great, great questions of life and death, then this is your lucky day. Even more, you aren’t required to come up with a list of questions. Lewis has asked them for you. He does not pretend to know all the answers, but you get to hitch a ride with one of the greatest question-askers that I have ever come across.

One recommendation: Read Mere Christianity first. A basic understanding of how Lewis thinks will make the brief volume under consideration much richer. A Grief Observed is a real-time application of the conclusions reached in Mere Christianity. Lewis is a Christian man asking questions about the world that the one, true, and living God created and that the lord and savior Jesus Christ has redeemed.

Concerning the Christian paradigm by which Lewis considers his grief, here’s a final quote:

It doesn’t matter that all the photographs of (my late wife) are bad. It doesn’t matter—not much—if my memory of her is imperfect. Images, whether on paper or in the mind, are not important for themselves. Merely links. Take a parallel from an infinitely higher sphere. Tomorrow morning a priest will give me little round, thin, cold, tasteless wafer. Is it a disadvantage—is it not in some ways an advantage—that it can’t pretend the least resemblance to that which it unites me?

I need Christ, not something that resembles Him. I want (my late wife), not something that is like her. A really good photograph might become in the end a snare, a horror, an obstacle.

Images, I must suppose, have their use or they would not have been so popular. (It makes little difference whether they are pictures and statues outside the mind or imaginative constructions within it.) To me however, their danger is more obvious. Images of the Holy easily become holy images–sacrosanct. My idea of God is not a divine idea. It has to be shattered time after time. He shatters it Himself. He is the great iconoclast. Could we not almost say that this shattering is one of the marks of His presence? The Incarnation is the supreme example; it leaves all previous ideas of Messiah in ruins. And most are ‘offended’ by the iconoclasm; and blessed are those who are not. But the same thing happens in our private prayers.

All reality is iconoclastic…

Okay, I have to stop. I’ve probably aggravated some copyright laws already. I highly recommend spending a morning or an evening drinking from the redolent fountain of C. S. Lewis. We are blessed that he took the time to journal this difficult period of his life. You will be blessed by taking the time to read it.

Amazon has the book here.

<>написание текстов к ам

Read more

By In Books, Culture

The Missing “Missing Link”

by Marc Hays

Followingexploring creation biology cover is a collection of passages from Wile and Durnell’s, Exploring Creation with Biology. Classical Conversations uses the Apologia series of textbooks for their “Research Strands” through high school. I grow increasingly thankful for the fine work Apologia has done by providing our high school students with these invaluable science texts.

These quotes are from Module 9: “Evolution: Part Scientific Theory, Part Unconfirmed Hypothesis.”

“The lack of intermediate links was the most vexing problem that Darwin had with his hypothesis. In fact, in his book, he stated:

Geological research, though it has added numerous species to existing and extinct genera, and has made the intervals between some few groups less wide than they otherwise would have been, yet has done scarcely anything in breaking the distinction between species, by connecting them together by numerous, fine, intermediate varieties; and this not having been affected, is probably the gravest and most obvious of all the many objections which can be raised against my views. (Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, 6th ed, {New York, NY: Collier Books, 1962}, 462)

“Well, what of these missing links? Has paleontology uncovered them? The answer to that is an unequivocal no. Read, for example the words of Dr. David Raup, the curator of the Chicago Field Museum of Natural History and an expert on the fossil record.

Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin, and knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded…ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as the result of more detailed information. (David Raup, Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 50:25, 197 – emphasis added)

“Since Dr. Raup’s quote is more than 20 years old, you might wonder whether paleontology has discovered anything in the past two decades to make the situation better for macroevolution. The answer is a clear and convincing no. Consider for example, this summary of the state of paleontology in regard to macroevolution:

…according to Darwin…the fossil record should be rife with examples of transitional forms leading from the less to more evolved…Instead of filling the gaps in the fossil record with so-called missing links, most paleontologists found themselves facing a situation in which there were only gaps in the fossil record, with no evidence of transformational intermediates between documented fossil species. (Jeffrey H. Schwartz, Sudden Origins, [New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1999], 89)

“Now think about this for a minute. The hypothesis of macroevolution tries to explain something about earth’s past. Since no one was around back then to tell us whether or not macroevolution actually happened, it is necessary to look for data that either support or contradict the hypothesis. Well, if you’re looking for data about earth’s history, where is the first place you would look? You would look in the fossil record! What does the fossil record say? It says that macroevolution never happened! Do you see what we mean when we say that scientists don’t belive in macroevolution today because of evidence? If the fossil record (the main place you look for information about earth’s past) shows no evidence for macroevolution, scientists simply should not believe in it.” (Wile & Durnell, Exploring Creation with Biology, 2nd Edition, [Anderson, IN: Apologia Educational Ministries, 2005], 274-275)

Wile & Durnell then point out that Schwartz and Raup are pointing out the lack of evidence for Darwin’s transitional forms in order to posit the notion of “punctuated equilibrium.” This spin on evolutionary theory tries to reinterpret macroevolution so that the lack of evidence for evolution becomes the evidence that evolution occurred. The idea being that transitional forms are by their nature short-lived, and therefore missing from the fossil record.

Or in other words, “the macroevolutionary emperor has no clothes, so we thought we’d cover him up with some fresh expert opinion.”

This is not intended to be the answer to the hypothesis of macroevolution, but this can serve as fodder for discussion with many people in our society. If they’re well-read, then they may have a reply, but I daresay many people in our culture are tickled pink to remain Darwinian, without any punctuated nuances. Their belief in evolution may make them feel better about their personal disbelief in the God who created them, but it does so based on their own religious presuppositions, not on any sure footing in the fossil record. Their faith may be in science, but their god has failed them.

(Advertisement: If you’re looking for a fantastic high school science curriculum, look no further. Check out the Apologia series here.)

 

 <>контекстная интернет реклама а

Read more

By In Books, Family and Children

Handmade Catechism Books

Photo Joyful Hearts & Faces.

Allow me to endorse to you The Purple Carrot.

Mary Lee of The Purple Carrot fame is the wife of a former elder of ours in Florida, who is now resident in California. They have the passel of children that is usual with Reformed families, theirs being particularly handsome. And they catechize these children of theirs, which is a holy, wise, and constructive thing to do.

They catechize them with The Purple Carrot products: handsome hand-made copies of the Catechism for Young Children, the Westminster Shorter, and the Heidelberg. (Let my product endorsement begin!)

Catechization is an important and integral part of Christian education. When our kids reach a certain age we buy them their own Bibles, but the idea of having individual copies of the Westminster Shorter Catechism for each child hadn’t occurred to us until we got our little cloth-bound beauty in the mail.

 

If you want to see a little more of the book, watch my video embedded below. You can find Mary Lee’s Etsy store here.

Each book is different, with different covers, binding, and fonts. She also sells blank books to be used as journals, as well as other random-cool hand-made stuff. Go on, visit her Etsy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKQSwJ_BpP4<>позиций а

Read more

By In Books, Culture, Family and Children

Free Copy of Pastor Uri Brito’s “The Trinitarian Father”

Hello dear Kuyperians. You might have noticed some recent excitement here at your favorite Kuyper-inspired website over the publication of Uri Brito’s booklet The Trinitarian Father. As Steve Wilkins said, “Pastor Brito helps us to see what God’s nature implies for us and requires of us as fathers. His essay is an excellent beginning to getting us into Trinitarian shape.”

You can buy the book here, for a mere $8, and it is well worth the purchase, dear friends.

Even more exciting than that, however, is the prospect of getting a free copy. Which you can now do by making sure you’ve joined our current book giveaway. There are now two prizes, the first drawing being for Bread & Wine and Watch For The Light, and the second drawing being for The Trinitarian Father.

Even if you’ve already entered, share the contest. The more people join through your link, the more entries you have. Contest ends on Sunday the 5th.

As the Huguenots probably never say, bonne chance!

[contesthopper contest=”7513″]<>klasnobotкопирайтинг заказ статей

Read more

By In Books

Shameless Plug: The Trinitarian Father by Uri Brito

The word is out. My latest work, a booklet, entitled “The Trinitarian Father” is out!

Covenant Media Foundation is making each copy available for $8.  The book has received wonderful endorsements. It took me several years to put it together. Though brief (only 55 pages), it provides a wonderful overview for how earthly fathers are called to imitate our heavenly father. This is a biblical theology of fatherhood.

“Someone has said that most evangelicals have ignored the reality of the Trinity so thoroughly, that they are, for all practical purposes, Unitarians. That is sadly true. And that makes this essay all the more important for the twenty-first century Christian. If we are created after the image of the Triune God, then we must understand ourselves and our responsibilities in life in light of that glorious and amazing fact. Pastor Brito helps us to see what God’s nature implies for us and requires of us as fathers. His essay is an excellent beginning to getting us into Trinitarian shape.” ―Steve Wilkins, Pastor of Auburn Avenue Presbyterian Church in Monroe, Louisiana

Here’s the special deal: As a reader of KC, I am selling each copy for $6 (S&H included) for a limited time. If you wish to order more than 5 copies, I can provide a better deal. Just e-mail me at uriesou@gmail.com.<>раскрутка а в поисковых системахseo продвижение  ов

Read more

By In Books

Docteur Dans la Cuisine

Guest Post by Mark Nenadov

Introduction

Have you ever found a little, unassuming book, only to find that takes you by the feet, and shakes you up a bit?

About seven years ago, I found such a book in the University of Windsor library here in Canada. It was an English translation of The Humaness of John Calvin: The Reformer as a Husband, Father, Pastor & Friend by Richard Stauffer.

On the surface, there’s probably nothing in that little 100 or so page book that is, earth shattering. But, nonetheless, it blew me away at the time.

Stauffer does not resort to hagiography, but attempts to give a brief and accurate portrayal of John Calvin in various spheres as Husband, Father, Pastor, and Friend was really illuminating. Stauffer clearly shows Calvin in a way that contradicts the false image of him as a cold-hearted dictator. He shows a pastor who supports the very church leadership which overthrew him. He shows a father and husband who cares for his family through difficult circumstances, such as the plague. He shows a faithful friend, who seeks out friendships and nurtures them, pouring himself out for his friends.

Three Surprising Angles

There are, however, three other aspects of Calvin which aren’t really hinted at in the title.

1. Calvin as a Bachelor. In a letter to William Farel, the single John Calvin reveals his ideals of beauty, love, and femininity. He does have a bit of a “starry eyed” side, so much so that Melanchton teases him by saying he was “dreaming of getting married”. The single life was discouraging for him, and he even once asked whether he should “search [for a wife] any more”. And, yet, the noble bachelor had a serious view of marriage, even reversing the typical platitude about celibacy, commenting that getting a wife would be done in order to “dedicate myself more completely to the Lord”. As it turns out, at the age of 31, Calvin found himself an “upright and honest…even pretty” women in Idlette de Bure.

2. Calvin as a Matchmaker. Calvin desired good matches for his friends, and sought to take actions towards that.

3. Calvin as an Insulted Man. This one is less surprising, and is generally common knowledge to most Reformed people. However, there are some surprising details to this that Stauffer covers.

One Particular Line of “Insults”

I would like to elaborate on #3 a bit. It is incredible to see how far Calvin’s opponents went to bring his name and character through the mud. I seem to remember one attack claiming that Calvin had rats crawling in his garments, or something similar to that.

Since reading Stauffer’s book, I learned that one French Catholic writer, Louis Richeome, in a hit piece on the Huguenots, actually made the audacious claim that Calvin’s impudence “surpasses that of the Devil”.

And, yet, not all of Calvin’s most staunch opponents realized how their words could be taken two ways. Stauffer’s book provides a delightful example of this. One particularly flamboyant critic of Calvin, Jacques Desmay, who was the vicar-general of the diocese of Rouen, tried to condemn Calvin, but it sounds to “Kuyperian” ears more like a commendation:

“[John Calvin] is the author of a religion of the table, the stomach, the fat, the flesh, the kitchen”

“in [John Calvin], the whole reformation only tendeth to “establish the reign of wine, women and song”.

Conclusion

Although, I am sure John Calvin would not have felt that was a fair characterization of the Reformation, I can’t help but surmise that he must have taken a certain secret delight that this was really the best Jacques Desmay could come up with.

There is some measure of truth in it in this attack, especially when we consider these statements in light of Calvin’s writings about beauty and God’s gifts. He certainly felt that God gave things such as food and drink in a spirit of “superabundant liberality”.

Joel Beeke, in Living For God’s Glory: An Introduction to Calvinism, says it well:

“Typically, Calvin uses the complexio oppositorum when explaining the Christian’s relation to the world, presenting opposites to find a middle way between them. Thus, on the one hand, cross-bearing crucifies us to the world and the world to us. On the other hand, the devout Christian enjoys this present life, albeit with due restraint and moderation, for he is taught to use things in this world for the purpose that God intended for them. Calvin was no ascetic; he enjoyed good literature, good food, and the beauties of nature.”

Calvin’s detractors took the fact that Calvin promoted the enjoyment of these good gifts, and blew this a bit out of proportion.

I suppose sometimes our enemies even get us partially right. And sometimes insults go both ways. I suppose it wouldn’t be such a bad thing if we, in our day, had a few more “Docteurs Dans la Cuisine”, theologians with a hearty appreciation for things that fill the plate and the cup.  And if that causes detractors to think it is establishing a reign of “a religion of the kitchen”, so be it!

For more publications and updates on Mr. Nenadov, see GoodreadsBlog, TwitterLinkedinWebsite<>mobile rpg game1 продвижение ов

Read more

By In Books

And the Winner is…

Mark Nenadov. Over 80 participants entered to win a copy of Robert Capon’s classic The Supper of the Lamb. Thanks to everyone for participating.

Congratulations, Mark! Stay tuned for new offers!

Read more

By In Books, Politics

Democracy Promised, Dictatorship Provided

pipes communismIf you are a regular here at the KC blog, then you know full-well that I’ve been reading Rosenstock-Huessy’s Out of Revolution and enjoying it immensely. Although it is an 800 page book, he covers a lot of ground and, therefore, must move along quite rapidly. Often, he presumes upon the reader to already know the basics of the history he’s interpreting. As I read, he progressed through the 2nd Russian Revolution too quickly for me. I got lost in the details. So, I decided to learn more.

In my research to acquire more info on the Russian Revolution, I came across the historian Richard Pipes. It turns out that everyone had heard of him except me. Sometimes that happens. Anyway, Richard Pipes is the Baird Professor of History, Emeritus, at Harvard University. He’s one of the foremost scholars on Russian communism, such that in 1992 he was called as an “expert witness in the Russian Constitutional Court’s trial against the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.”

The book I’m reading now, Communism: A History, is 160 pages long. His Concise History of the Russian Revolution is about 400 pages long, and the non-concise version comes in 3 volumes. So, if you’re interested in finding out more about 19th and 20th Century Russian history, Richard Pipes is a solid place to start.

I would love to entice some of you to order, and subsequently read, more about 20th Century communism. The parallels between communism, fascism, and the democratic-socialism currently being preached from DC’s legislative and executive pulpits are much too similar to be accidental. Now would be a great time to buy a Richard Pipes book and assign it to your high-schoolers. Better yet, read through it with them. You have a first-hand experience with the Cold War and the fall of the regime. Pass along what you know. Show them what “Utopia” looks like if you start with man and end with man. Utopia looks like famine, murder, and despair. Tens of millions of people were murdered in the pursuit of this atheistic ideal. Don’t miss the chance to put the bad taste of communism in their mouth before some freshman English teacher at the local junior college tries to teach them otherwise.

Here’s a quote from Communism: A History, chapter 2, “Leninism”:

The coup took place on November 7 (1917) when pro-Bolshevik units took over the capital without firing a shot. There was some fighting in Moscow, but in the rest of the country the transition proceeded quite smoothly. Lenin later said that taking power in Russia was as easy as “lifting a feather.” The reason was that he had cleverly camouflaged the seizure of power by himself and his party as the transfer of “all power to the soviets,” which slogan promised grassroots democracy rather than dictatorship. Even Lenin’s socialist rivals, who suspected his intentions, were not terribly upset, convinced that a Bolshevik one-party dictatorship could not possibly last and would soon yield to a socialist coalition. They preferred to let him exercise power for a while rather than unleash civil war that would only benefit the ‘counterrevolution.’

As it turned out, the Bolsheviks would stay in power for seventy-four years. Communism thus did not come to Russia as the result of a popular uprising: it was imposed on her from above by a small minority hiding behind democratic slogans. This salient fact was to determine its course. (emphasis mine)

Democracy promised. Dictatorship provided.

The up-and-coming generation will probably not get a course in communism from their high school curriculum. You’re going to need to show them.

You can order the book here.

Here are some of my previous quotes and thoughts on Marxism and communism on KC:

Your Weekly Dose of Rosenstock

Paul Johnson on Karl Marx

Rosenstock-Huessy on Tolstoi and Dostoevski

Lincoln, Lenin, Roosevelt, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Obama

<>siteкупить продвижение а

Read more

By In Books, Family and Children

Feast With Us! Win a Copy of Supper of the Lamb

It would give us great joy to share the joy of these seasons with you. Our God is the God of winter, and the God of feasting! Laissez les bons temps of Thanksgiving and Christmas rouler!

[contesthopper contest=”7239″]<>инструменты копирайтерареклама на е от яндекса

Read more

By In Books, Culture, Politics, Theology

Born Out of Never: Happy Birthday Abe

KuyperProfile

October 29th marks the birthday of Kuyperian Commentary’s namesake, namely Abraham Kuyper (29 October 1837 – 8 November 1920), – the Dutch politician and party founder, statesman, prime minister, theologian, educator, linguist, pastor, author, founder of the Free University of Amsterdam, founder and editor of De Standaard (the most popular daily newspaper in the Netherlands), as well as the editor of the weekly magazine De Heraut (the Herald). a A veritable polymath of a man. b

Over at CanonWired, Pastors Douglas Wilson & Toby J Sumpter explore the question: “What’s Does It Mean to Be ‘Kuyperian’?”

http://vimeo.com//15401618

Birthdays are times of reflection and of giving, and those who know me are aware that I like to share things that peak my curiosity and give me joy. And so, I’ll leave this little birthday note with some quotes by and about Kuyper and some links for further exploration into what it means to be ‘Kuyperian’:

“There is not one part of our world of thought that than can be hermetically separated from other parts, and there is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry, ‘Mine!'” c

“Christianity goes beyond personal salvation. Christianity encompasses everything.”d

“In the midst of corruptions, your duty as an equipped disciple of Christ is to always seek to uphold that which is honorable, that which is lovely and that which is of good report among mankind.” (ibid)

“A Christian culture is established through the education of a Christian populace.”(ibid)

“If there were no other way open to knowledge than through discursive thought,. . . because of the uncertainty . . . which is the penalty of sin, and [because of] the impossibility [of having therefore an objective method to decide] between truth and falsehood,” skepticism would reign.” (Principles 123) e

“Never forget that all state relief for the poor is a blot on the honor of your savior. The fact that the government needs a safety net to catch those who would slip between the cracks of our economic system is evidence that I have failed to do God’s work. The government cannot take the place of Christian charity. A loving embrace isn’t given with food stamps. The care of a community isn’t provided with government housing. The face of our Creator can’t be seen on a welfare voucher. What the poor need is not another government program; what they need is for Christians like me to honor our savior.”f

“If you see a thing, you are probably called to it.”g

“What is hell other than a realm in which unholiness works without restraint in body and soul?” h

“Kuyper himself had urged that all human thought be gov­erned by a Christian worldview derived from Scripture. To Kuyper, this worldview was antithetical to every secular ideology, whether philosophical, political, economic, aesthetic, or whatever. Kuyper’s disciples sought to bring the Christian worldview to bear on politics, education, and journalism; naturally, some sought to express it in phi­losophy as well.” ~ Dr. John M Frame i

 <>mega-vzlomстоимость рекламы на авто

  1. TheChristianAlmanac  (back)
  2. http://www.wordmp3.com/stream.aspx?id=5482  (back)
  3. http://www.reformationalpublishingproject.com/pdf_books/Scanned_Books_PDF/SphereSovereignty_English.pdf  (back)
  4. http://www.wordmp3.com/stream.aspx?id=13606  (back)
  5. http://kuyperian.blogspot.com/2004/10/what-does-it-mean-to-be-kuyperian.html  (back)
  6. KuyperPoverty  (back)
  7. “When Abraham Kuyper saw a thing, he acted on it.” ~ Dr. George Grant
    http://grantian.blogspot.com/2013/10/abraham-kuyper.html  (back)
  8. KuyperHolySpirit  (back)
  9. http://www.frame-poythress.org/cornelius-van-til/  (back)

Read more