Francis Schaeffer
Tag Archive

By In Culture, History, Theology

A Dead Man Dying: The Life of Francis Schaeffer

Francis August Schaeffer died twice. He died once May 15, 1984 at the age of 73. But he had died once before that, back in 1930. He was a senior in high school and he had just read through the entire Bible from Genesis to Revelation. At that time, he was an agnostic and was thinking about throwing out the Bible permanently. But after he read through the Bible, he was struck by the truth of the Scriptures and his life was never the same. The day he submitted his life to the Truth, he died. 

That first death shaped everything for Francis. His college career bent quickly toward ministry, specifically pastoral work. Even when his parents insisted on a more practical career, Francis knew that God had called him to ministry. Francis threw himself into studies and his work. He sought out those in need and ministered to them. One of his tactics was to catch up with students who had been drinking Saturday evening and help them get home and as part of his help, he got them to agree to come to church with him the next day. This would become a signature part of his ministry: befriend the needy who are close at hand.  

Francis studied at Hampden-Sydney college and then later he went to Westminster Theological Seminary. He met his wife, Edith, when they both attended a talk given by a Unitarian who was arguing that “Jesus is not the Son of God”. Francis stood up and argued against the speaker’s erroneous position. Edith also stood up, agreeing with Francis. She quoted Dr. Gresham Machen in her response (Francis Schaeffer, by Colin Duriez, p. 30-31). This intrigued Francis. They met up later and began a friendship. The work of publicly defending the Christian faith defined their lives together. This was the beginning of many opportunities for both of them to work together and defend the truth. 

When Francis was done with seminary work, he went on to pastor a few churches. One in Grove City PA, another in Chester PA, and then a third in St. Louis. During this time, he and Edith worked on ministry to young people. They created a Summer Bible School to minister to children which eventually developed into Children for Christ (p 59). Because of this work, the Independent Board for Presbyterian Foreign Missions in 1947 asked Francis to tour Europe for three months and make a detailed report on thirteen countries. This was his first work in France and Switzerland. Francis and Edith were then asked by the Board to be missionaries in Europe. They were commissioned to work with the World Council of Churches. It was in Amsterdam where Francis first met Hans Rookmaker and an enduring friendship formed that lasted throughout their lives. One evening, Hans met up with Francis and they began talking about Jazz music, which Hans was very interested in. This sparked an extensive conversation and, as Edith reported, they spent the night wandering the streets, discussing Christianity and culture (p 77). 

In the early 1950s, Francis went through something of a spiritual crisis which caused him to re-examine all of his beliefs about Christianity. He proceeded to work through these things in great detail over the next few months. Through this struggle, he became more thoroughly convinced of the truth of Christianity and how it answered what he called “the problem of reality.” His later book True Spirituality contains much of the ideas and philosophical problems that he wrestled with during that time. Through this spiritual struggle new fruit developed and Francis renewed his ministry to people in Europe and the seeds for L’Abri were planted. 

At this time, he was ministering to people in Switzerland, but because of his work in a region that was heavily Roman Catholic he was asked to leave because he was proselytizing. They were kicked out Feb 14, 1955 (p 127). Even though they were forced out of one portion of Switzerland, they were granted permission to go to another part. He resigned from the missionary board in June of that same year and he and Edith decided to go to the tiny village of Huemoz and purchase Chalet les Melezes. They needed a down payment of one thousand dollars in order to make the purchase and they received a letter in the mail with that exact amount (p 131).

The work of L’Abri began and guests began to visit. Many of the first visitors were friends of the Schaeffer children who were now in high school and college. This work blossomed into more and more people coming. The ministry of the home was to invite all people who were interested in questions about reality and Francis would dialogue with anyone. This work brought many people from all around. 

The work became so famous that a journalist from Time magazine made a visit in November 30, 1959. January 11, 1960 the article was published entitled “Mission to Intellectuals” (p 150). The ministry expanded into a tape ministry and a book ministry and eventually included two movies: How Should We Then live?  and Whatever Happened to the Human Race? The book How Should We Then Live? is still an important read, forty years later. Other works include Escape from Reason and The God Who Is There

Later at the end of his life, when someone asked Francis what the reason is for being a Christian, he responded by saying, “There’s one reason and only one reason to be a Christian, which is that you’re convinced it is the truth of the universe” (p 109). In 1978, he found out that he had cancer. Treatment for it was able to push it into remission and he continued his work for another six years. 

His daughter records that at the end of his life, when Francis was on his deathbed, she visited with him. She says that he was going in and out of consciousness and “there were several occasions when he was much more lucid, and once I said, “Is it true?”–what a thing to say to a dying person–and he said, “It is absolutely true, absolutely sure” (p 204).

That scene captures the ministry of Schaeffer: a dying man who takes the time to answer the questions of another. And that question is the one that Schaeffer knew to be the most important one.

Read more

By In Culture, Family and Children

Raising Life-long Learners and Leaders

In his book Beauty for Truth’s Sake, Stratford Caldecott states that it is,

“no wonder students come to a college education expecting nothing more than a set of paper qualifications that will enable them to earn a decent salary.  The idea that they might be there to grow as human beings, to be inducted into an ancient culture, to become somehow more than they are already, is alien to them.  They expect instant answers, but they have no deep questions.  The great questions have not yet been woken in them.  The process of education requires us to become open, receptive, curious, and humble in the face of what we do not know.  The world is a fabric woven of mysteries, and a mystery is a provocation to our humanity that cannot be dissolved by googling a few more bits of information.”

Mr. Caldecott has aptly described a generation who has been taught that they are nothing more than highly-developed mammals, and how highly-developed is still up for grabs. We have 90% less fur and 99% less purpose than our monkey’s uncle. As long as a young man makes enough to pay for his Playstation and Netflix, he’s good to go. This postmodern generation is enslaved to their evolutionary apathy. This apathy reminded Francis Schaeffer of Ancient Rome. In his book How Should We Then Live he said,

“As the Roman economy slumped lower and lower, burdened with aggravated inflation and a costly government, authoritarianism increased to counter the apathy… …because of the general apathy and its results, and because of oppressive control, few thought the civilization worth saving.  Rome did not fall because of external forces such as the invasion of the barbarians.  Rome had no sufficient inward base; the barbarians only completed the breakdown—and Rome gradually became a ruin.”

America is reaping what Jean Jacques Rousseau, John Dewey and Horace Mann have sown. America is reaping what America has sown. We cannot turn back the clock; so we must decide how we are going to respond, and where we can go from here. The opposite of apathy is passion. The opposite of slavery is freedom, and the opposite of modern, socialist education is classical, Christian education.

With the classical tools of learning, constructed upon the solid foundation of God’s Word, students will not only excel at whatever their hand finds to do, but they will be able to become leaders in their particular field of interest. So, we are not just raising life-long learners, but we are also raising life-long leaders. Are we training our children to be the next generation of leaders in Christendom, or are we assuming that someone else will take care of that?  If Christians aren’t doing it, then who is? Is the apathy in our culture limited to the twenty-somethings in their Star Wars pajamas, living with their moms, playing Wii all day, or does it extend further than that?

Are we passionate for the Kingdom? Are we avoiding government schools because we have a vision for our children’s future in Christ’s Kingdom or merely to avoid drug use, school violence, and free condoms?  Our vision for child-rearing must extend beyond the things we’re trying to avoid and manifest itself in all the things that we are working to accomplish, namely the coming of Christ’s Kingdom on earth as it is in heaven. The classical model is not the only way to raise up your little olive shoots in the fear and admonition of the Lord, but it is a premiere tool to accomplish the rearing of passionate, Christian, life-long learners and leaders.

(This was short, I know. Here are some resources to flesh out the bald assertions I’ve just made.)

Click here or on the book cover to link to this title on Amazon.

Case for CCE

Click here to link to an outstanding lecture by George Grant on Classical Christian Education. It’s available free of charge at wordmp3.com

image.ashx

<>mobi gamespr программа пример

Read more

By In Scribblings

Marc Hays: A Properly Christian Humanism

shaeffer“For the scientists who were functioning on a Christian base, there was an incentive to continue searching for the objective truth which they had good reason to know was there. Then, too, with the biblical emphasis on the rightness of work and the dignity of all vocations, it was natural that the things that were learned should flow over into the practical side and not remain the matter of mere intellectual curiosity and that, in other words, technology, in the beneficial sense, should be born.

What was the view of these modern scientists on a Christian base? They held to the concept of the uniformity of natural causes in an open system, or, as it may also be expressed, the uniformity of natural causes in a limited time span. God has made a cause-and-effect universe; therefore we can find out something about the causes and the effects. But (and the but is very important) it is an open universe because God and man are outside of the uniformity of natural causes. In other words, all that exists is not one big cosmic machine which includes everything. Of course, if a person steps in front of a moving auto, the cause-and-effect universe functions upon him; but God and people are not a part of a total cosmic machine. Things go on in a cause-and-effect sequence, but at a point of time the direction may be changed by God or by people. Consequently, there is a place for God, but there is also a proper place for man.

This carries with it something profound–that the machine, whether the cosmic machine or the machines people make, is neither master nor a threat–because the machine does not include everything. There is something which is “outside” of the cosmic machine, and there is a place for man to be man.”

Francis Schaeffer, How Should We Then Live, Chapter 7, “The Rise of Modern Science”

Click on the book cover to magically travel to a bookseller somewhere in the Amazon.

how should we then live

<>racer game daownloadпроверить позицию а по запросу

Read more