Theology
Category

By In Theology

Does Baptism DO Anything? Is the Bible true?

baptism christLots of Evangelicals want to answer “no” to this question.

Actually, that understates the situation. Evangelicals typically look at you as if you are insane to bring up the questions, let alone to state the affirmative.

The problem with this position is that Evangelicals are bound to believe what the Bible teaches. And the Bible says inconvenient things, like

  • “baptism now saves you” (1 Peter 3.21),
  • “all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3.27, 28),
  • “by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free” (1 Corinthians 12.13),
  • “all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus have been baptized into His death… Therefore we have been buried with Him through baptism into death, in order that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life” (Romans 6.3, 4),
  • “in Christ you were also circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, in the removal of the body of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ; having been buried with Him in baptism, in which you were also raised up with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead” (Colossians 3.11, 12).

Many people have decided that since they know the Bible could not possibly be saying such things about baptism, the baptism being referred to must be a dry “spiritual” baptism, not water baptism.

But again there are some inconvenient statements in the Bible. For example, in the book of Acts in the first sermon of the Church, Peter gives this altar call: “Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2.38). Here, there is no question that normal water baptism is intended, because the text goes on to record that three thousand were baptized that day in response to Peter’s words.

Or consider Paul’s testimony about what Ananias said to get him to submit to baptism:

“And one Ananias, a devout man according to the law, well spoken of by all the Jews who lived there, came to me, and standing by me said to me, “Brother Saul, receive your sight.” And at that very hour I received my sight and saw him. And he said, “The God of our fathers appointed you to know his will, to see the Righteous One and to hear a voice from his mouth; for you will be a witness for him to everyone of what you have seen and heard. And now why do you wait? Rise and be baptized and wash away your sins, calling on his name.” (Acts 22:12-16, ESV)

Yet Peter’s statements about baptism are quite similar to those in the New Testament Epistles quoted above. On what basis do we claim that the Epistles must not be speaking of water baptism? Are not the quotations from Acts just as challenging? There is no evidence that readers of the apostles’ letters to them would regard there mentions of baptism as not referring to the baptism which they had undergone and which they practiced with water.

We can be sure, of course, that baptism does not absolutely guarantee that a person will inherit glory and escape condemnation at the resurrection. The Apostle Paul says amazing things about baptism in chapter 12 of his first letter to the Corinthians, but he warns them earlier that baptism does not mean they will escape the wrath of Jesus if they worship other gods (1 Corinthians 10.1-12). Likewise, Acts tells us of a man named Simeon who was baptize but then manifested an unbelieving heart (Acts 8.9-24). Also, when the Apostle Peter writes, “baptism now saves you” he compares baptism to the Noah and his family brought to safety through the flood on the Ark. Yet Ham apostatized and rebelled as both Peter and his readers must have known.

I am leaving out many possible further allusions to baptism in the New Testament. I think the way baptism is somehow kept out of such passages and Jesus’ words to Nicodemus in John 3 (despite the surrounding context of the work of John the baptizer), or Titus 3.5, or Hebrews 10.22 is rather amazing. But I stick with the even more obvious statements so as not to quibble.

So what are we to think of baptism?

First of all, we need to remember that we ourselves can do things through signs and God is no less powerful than we are. We enter marriage through ceremonies, many cultures effect adoption by ceremonies, and the simple words “I promise” are means of doing something through a statement. The baptizer is not acting on his own, but is acting as God’s representative. Just as God is the one who marries a man and woman through human agency (Matthew 19.6; Mark 10.9), so baptism is God’s act, not man’s.

If we try to solve this puzzle of baptism without considering anything besides the ritual itself, I don’t think a solution is available. However, what if we consider the fact that Jesus established a new society, His Church?

The Church is “the household of God” (1 Timothy 3.15; 1 Peter 4.17). She is the Bride of Christ (Ephesians 5.32) and the mother of all believers (Galatians 4.26). She is a corporate priesthood and royal dynasty (1 Peter 2.5, 9; Revelation 1.6). The Church has been given Jesus Christ (Ephesians 1.22, 23) with all his benefits and gifts of the Spirit (1 Cor 12.4ff).

Here we have an angle that allows baptism to be something incredibly important and yet avoids superstition or false assurance. Baptism is how one enters the Church. If the Church is the family of God (1 Timothy 3.15; 1 Peter 4.17) and the mother of all believers (Galatians 4.26), and if baptism is how one is admitted into the Church (1 Corinthians 12.13), then naturally, baptism would be the normal way one is adopted into God’s family as one of his children (Galatians 3.26, 27).

While members of the Church are promised forgiveness, the Spirit, and many other benefits, the Bible does not say that all members of the Church will take advantage of these great things. Sadly, some do not persevere in what they have been given. They must receive God’s promises and gifts by faith. One is justified by faith, after all–a persevering faith (Hebrews 10.35-39).

But the fact that baptism and membership among God’s people does not guarantee one will inherit eternal life, does not mean that we should disregard it as of no significance. We should not be like Esau who despised his birthright and traded it for red stew. We should regard the promises made to us by God in baptism to be so precious that we would never trade them for all the treasures of creation.

The point here is that it is easier to trust Christ to save us and bring us to the resurrection in glory if one is confident that one has been entrusted to Christ. The Church is Jesus’ special trust and we receive in baptism God’s promise that we belong to him and he to us. We must respond to this in faith by following Christ all our days.

No one should presume on his baptism as a “free pass” into heaven, but neither should anyone despise his baptism in unbelief.<>продвижение а по трафику москваподобрать ключевые слова для а онлайн

Read more

By In Theology

Hooked

Lure 1

Recently my son brought his fishing pole into the basement.  We have rules about these types of things.  Fishing poles belong in the shed or possibly on the porch. They do not come into the house.  Fishing poles are like sticks, big rocks, snakes, and lizards. They belong outside. My son knows this.  But like all of us, he sometimes does not do what he is told.

The bait on the pole looked like the one pictured above. It was big with numerous hooks designed to snare some large fish lurking beneath the surface of a local lake or river.  Each of these hooks has a barb designed to keep the fish from getting off the hook.  These barbs make extraction of a hook only slightly easier than extracting a tooth.

What do you think happened when my son brought his rod into the house?  It would be nice if I could tell you that all went well, that the lure just slid across the tile floor and caused no trouble. But then I wouldn’t have anything to write about. No. The hooks, all three of them, eventually got snagged on our blue couch cushion. (Lures do this. They gravitate, almost like they are alive, towards the place they can do the most harm.) My son tried to remove them, but hooks are designed to embed themselves deeper the more you mess with them. By the time the cushion was laid contritely on my desk all three hooks were firmly entangled in the pillow.

After about thirty minutes of labor that included a knife, pliers, and more than one muttered word of frustration, I finally removed all three hooks. The pillow was still usable, but it was no longer whole. The hooks had left their mark.

As I sat extracting the lure, I thought how much this reminds me of my own life.  I know what God tells me to do. Do not lose your temper. Do not get bitter.  Do not be proud. Love your neighbor.  [Insert your own sin here.]  Yet I still bring sin into the house. Maybe I assume, like my son did, that the sin will not cause much trouble. It will innocently slide across the tile floor with little damage.  But that rarely happens.  Sin gravitates towards the place it can do the most harm.  Sin has barbs. When sin enters it finds a target and embeds itself deep. The unfortunate person hooked may be my wife or my children or myself.  But sin never leaves its catch whole.  It can be removed but, there is always damage.  If I am lucky the damage only takes a day or two to fix.

I am grateful for Christ and his forgiveness. He takes away my sins and gives me grace that I might be restored. The glory of this truth is beyond compare. But I do not want to just keep coming back for forgiveness. I want to learn to leave sin where it belongs.  I want to listen to the Lord with an ear to obedience.   Christ has not just given me grace to be forgiven, but he has also given me grace to overcome. When I lean on his grace sin is not given the chance to hook me or my family. It is left where it belongs, outside.<>live chat для апозиции а в поисковых системах

Read more

By In Family and Children, Theology

The New Testament Openly Commands the Baptism of Children

PENTECOST

Acts 2 at Pentecost provides key verses for interpreting baptism.

 

THE BAPTISM FIGHT OVER ACTS 2

When credobaptists and paedobaptists contend over the meaning of Acts 2.37-39, the baptists (credobaptists) usually have the easier time in front of the audience because most of us are ready to hear through baptistic ears – doesn’t it say “repent”? And so they posit that a baby cannot turn from idols. The paedobaptist thinks the baby is turned in heart toward God, and that the direction of heart requirement is taken care of. Hasn’t God always been “God to you and to your children”? Isn’t that enough?

The other major argument which works well as a crowd-pleaser in favor of the credobaptist view is the word, “and” connected to the apparent qualifier, “all those who are far off, as many as the Lord our God shall call to himself.” That is, “the promise,” they say, is not for every last one of you-plural, but for as many of you-plural whom the Lord calls. It is not for your children, but for as many of your children as the Lord calls; and it is not for all those far off, but for as many foreigners as the Lord calls.

Isn’t this an obvious and simple use of the distributive property of multiplication?

(A + B + C)(X) = AX + BX + CX

We might ask: if no group is being specified, then why is a listing of groups given at all? (more…)

Read more

By In Theology

Life Together

By Uri Brito

Bonhoeffer’s Life Together is an apologetic for community life. But it is also a rebuke to those who take for granted the life in the community. Bonhoeffer sees community life as a privilege. The martyred prophet spoke of life together as an honor secured by the death of Jesus Christ. While many suffer the effects of aloneness, Bonhoeffer urges us not to forsake this blessed fellowship.

Life Together, life in the messiness of human existence– but the experience of messiness with other believers– is a gift of grace. The Lutheran writer spoke of community as a foretaste of the life to come. “It is only by a gracious anticipation of the last things that Christians are privileged to live in visible fellowship with other Christians.” a Eternal life is the beautification and glorification of life together. Eternal life is the perfection of community life.

This common life is all of grace. It is a privilege that should not be forsaken. To live separate lives is to despise grace. “It is grace, nothing but grace, that we are allowed to live in community with Christian brethren.” b “Do not forsake the assembly” (Heb. 10:25) is not only a call to gather for corporate worship–it is primarily this–but it is also a call to live together daily, dwelling together in unity (Ps. 133:1).

Life Together is life as God intended. It is the humanification of fallen creatures. Humans are most fallen when they live separated from others. They are most redeemed when they are together. They are most God-like when they enter into the communion of saints, participating in that Spirit-led body that the Father bought through the blood of the Son.<>mobile online games rpgпродвинуть в яндексе

  1. Bonhoeffer, Life Together, pg. 18  (back)
  2. Bonhoeffer, pg. 20  (back)

Read more

By In Theology

What the Pope Really Said

by Uri Brito

Fellow KC contributor, Adam McIntosh, has already expressed some valid concerns regarding the pope’s words. Allow me here to deal with the broader question without delving into the specific exegetical details. Many are asserting that the pope has declared his universalistic theology, thus altering traditional Catholic theology. Is the pope a universalist? I doubt it. The pope was offering his thoughts on the Gospel lesson from Mark 9:38-40. The point of the leader of the Roman Church had to do with whether an unbeliever (an atheist) could do good works. a The famous remarks had to do with the possibility of good works, and not with soteriology, strictly speaking. Here is the statement:

“[A]ll of us have this commandment at heart: do good and do not do evil. All of us. ‘But, Father, this is not Catholic! He cannot do good.’ Yes, he can…”The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! ‘Father, the atheists?’ Even the atheists. Everyone!…We must meet one another doing good. ‘But I don’t believe, Father, I am an atheist!’ But do good: we will meet one another there.”

Here is the surprising conclusion of this story: the head of Rome does not believe in limited atonement. Shocking, isn’t it? As the Church teaches in the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

“At the end of the parable of the lost sheep Jesus recalled that God’s love excludes no one: “So it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish.” He affirms that he came “to give his life as a ransom for many”; this last term is not restrictive, but contrasts the whole of humanity with the unique person of the redeemer who hands himself over to save us. The Church, following the apostles, teaches that Christ died for all men without exception: “There is not, never has been, and never will be a single human being for whom Christ did not suffer.” — (CCC, 605)

Catholic writer Brandon Vogt observes that there is a distinction between redemption and salvation in Catholic theology. Whereas redemption for all allows even atheists to do good works, salvation, on the other hand, is not for all. In his letter to the Founder of “La Repubblica” he writes: “…and it’s the fundamental thing – the mercy of God has no limits if one turns to him with a sincere and contrite heart.” b The conditional here is something like faith. However Catholics understand faith is another matter which can be discussed later, but to assert that the pope is saying that no belief is necessary to come to God is a falsity. In fact, his language echoes that of repentance: “if one turns to him with a sincere and contrite heart.” One does not need to support Rome’s theology to see that at the very least bloggers have not been wholly charitable to his words. There is a lot to debate and disagree with in this letter c, but to assume the pope is giving a soteriological carte blanche to Sam Harris and Christopher Dawkins is rather naive.<>копирайтинг виды текстовкомпании по обслуживанию ов яндекс

  1. Obviously more clarification would have been helpful, thus avoiding this article altogether  (back)
  2. http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/pope-francis-letter-to-the-founder-of-la-repubblica-italian-newspaper?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zenit%2Fenglish+%28ZENIT+English%29  (back)
  3. I disagree with much of it as a Protestant minister  (back)

Read more

By In Theology

The Flock Must Be Gathered Before Death Is Removed – Why Postmill?

Tissot_Jacob_and_Rachel_at_the_Well

Jacob and Rachel at the Well, Tissot

I’m going to tell you that the conquering of the nations will happen within history and is not merely an immediate transformation that will happen after the resurrection of judgment day. That is, I will argue for postmillennialism, but in a roundabout way. I could just tell you to read 1 Corinthians 15 and say that I think that about covers it, but I want to show something very fun I heard while listening to the story of Jacob meeting Rachel this week.

This post is not nearly as long as the last post, but it does have some pieces to set in place. I think it has a nifty payoff as well. I might add, I highly suggest investing zero dollars in a free app called Soundgecko. I prefer to listen to posts – it is easier than reading.

I need to set up the story context in Genesis, set up a note about the liturgical feasts of Israel, and then tie them into the Rachel and her sheep story. And suggest we do a lot of singing to make the world belong to Jesus. Here we go:

BROTHERS, SHEEP, AND DISUNITY
Once upon a time, two shepherds had so many sheep that they could not keep them from strife, so those brothers could not dwell together in unity. This was Abraham and Lot. Brother can mean relative.

And Lot, who went with Abram, also had flocks and herds and tents, 6 so that the land could not support both of them dwelling together; for their possessions were so great that they could not dwell together, 7 and there was strife between the herdsmen of Abram’s livestock and the herdsmen of Lot’s livestock.” (Gen 13.5-7)

Now hold that thought, it will need to be brought back up in a second.

THREE FEASTS
But in the course of time God did a lot of things. Things so big that he wanted them commemorated, and things that he wanted commemorated in anticipation of bigger things to come.

  • He passed over the sins of his people, while judging those who opposed him.
  • He passed out his word.
  • He let the people out of Egypt (taking many Egyptians with them) and allowed them to rest from slavery) taking them into a land of Sabbath Rest.

These are the three feasts of Passover, Weeks (Pentecost), Booths. Feasts which also anticipated the Cross, the coming Holy Spirit, and the in-gathering of the nations.

We know that these three feasts required a gathering of all Israel in Jerusalem every year. The flocks of Israel had to gather before the celebration. And because it meant gathering of God’s people, his sheep, it meant they would spend a week at a time in unity, in cramped quarters, in tents.…celebrating what God’s work had done to the world, and what it would do to the world to come.

And so they sang on the way to these feasts, the Psalms of Ascent (Pss 120-134). They even sang about brothers dwelling in cramped quarters and getting along, because that’s the picture of what salvation does for the world – makes the world a big, tight bundle of goodness, and full of people redeemed:

Behold how good and pleasant it is when brothers dwell in unity!.…For there YHWH has commanded the blessing: Life Eternal!” (Ps 133.1,3)

A BASIC PROBLEM RESOLVED ON A SMALL SCALE
What we have seen so far is that one basic problem to sin is that brothers cannot dwell in unity, and sheep flocks are driven apart. Liturgically, God designed to force brothers back into unity and to sing about it on the way to doing it. (This is something God likes to do a lot).

The flock have to be gathered together, and they sing about liking it, and then we see eternal life flowing out from Jerusalem to the world… It’s just the way the story goes.

A BASIC PROBLEM RESOLVED ON A BIG SCALE
We’re all well aware that Jesus did the big work of fixing the world during Passovera. And that he sent out his word as Spirit on Pentecost. These events necessarily took place while all Israel was gathered together in unity. He didn’t do them randomly in a moment of obscurity, but in a congregational setting, when they were together.

And there the Lord was crucified, and there the Lord was buried, and there the Lord rolled the stone out of the way of the tomb, and there the Lord commanded the blessing: Eternal Life! And there the Lord sent them out to get their inheritance of the ingathered nations.

A WEIRDER CONNECTION
Hunker down now for 14 verses from Genesis 29:

Then Jacob went on his journey and came to the land of the people of the east. 2 As he looked, he saw a well in the field, and behold, three flocks of sheep lying beside it, for out of that well the flocks were watered. The stone on the well’s mouth was large, 3 and when all the flocks were gathered there, the shepherds would roll the stone from the mouth of the well and water the sheep, and put the stone back in its place over the mouth of the well.

4 Jacob said to them, “My brothers, where do you come from?” They said, “We are from Haran.” 5 He said to them, “Do you know Laban the son of Nahor?” They said, “We know him.” 6 He said to them, “Is it well with him?” They said, “It is well; and see, Rachel his daughter is coming with the sheep!” 7 He said, “Behold, it is still high day; it is not time for the livestock to be gathered together. Water the sheep and go, pasture them.” 8 But they said, “We cannot until all the flocks are gathered together and the stone is rolled from the mouth of the well; then we water the sheep.”

9 While he was still speaking with them, Rachel came with her father’s sheep, for she was a shepherdess. 10 Now as soon as Jacob saw Rachel the daughter of Laban his mother’s brother, and the sheep of Laban his mother’s brother, Jacob came near and rolled the stone from the well’s mouth and watered the flock of Laban his mother’s brother. 11 Then Jacob kissed Rachel and wept aloud. 12 And Jacob told Rachel that he was her father’s kinsman, and that he was Rebekah’s son, and she ran and told her father.

13 As soon as Laban heard the news about Jacob, his sister’s son, he ran to meet him and embraced him and kissed him and brought him to his house. Jacob told Laban all these things, 14 and Laban said to him, “Surely you are my bone and my flesh!” And he stayed with him a month. (Gen 29.1-14)

END OF BIBLE QUOTE

DID YOU SEE IT?

We are in the same book where Lot and Abraham’s flocks and shepherds could not dwell in unity. And here we have the beginning of the story of when Israel himself is finding the wife (or wives) that will make Israel into many, many sheep, there we learn something about the plan. The shepherds wait for all to be gathered together, and then they roll the stone away, and then water can flow out to the sheep.

Just let it sit there for a bit and run over the imagistic connections for a while.

Of course, Jacob proved to be strong enough to roll the stone away on his own, and to take care of his bride’s many sheep. And we hear about brotherly unity – that bone of bones and flesh of flesh family oneness.

SINGING AND THE FUTURE OF THE WORLD – THE SOLUTION ON THE GRANDEST SCALE
We have a Lord who rolled a stone away and waters his flock weekly when we are gathered together. And he gave us a specific command to gather the nations.

The future of history looks like this (can you believe I am going to give you an outline of the future?):

1 – WORSHIP: The Church will continue the liturgical work of singing about gathering in unity while meeting with the Lord who declares salvation, and who flows out through us.
2 – INGATHERING: The nations will get gathered into the church. All the nations.
3 – FINAL RESURRECTION: The last enemy to be defeated will be death.
4 – ETERNAL CELEBRATION: Jesus will hand us all to his father together with himself as a head, and we will be a giant Trinitarian wedding gift – that bone and flesh kind.

Where do I get this outline? 1 Cor 15. (And Psalm 2 and Psalm 110).

I suggest reading Psalm 2 and 110, and then 1 Corinthians 15 and listening for promise that the Son will win the hand of all nations. That he will crush the heads of all wicked leaders of those nations and will supplant them (like Jacob) and take over their subjects. You can see the same thing in Daniel 7.

The fact that this happens on multiple levels should free us to read very similar statements (Like in Matt 24.14) as being about 70 AD and also applying to the future. This strengthens Postmillennialism and discards any hint of hyperpreterism. Postmill good. Heretical Hyperpreterism bad. We don’t need to choose between ingathering in the first century, and ingathering in the rest of history. Plus, you get to read 1 Corinthians 15 in a way that is natural to the wording in it.

Notice that this needs to happen within history, before “death” is done away with as the LAST enemy, as 1 Cor 15 explicitly says. The timing matters. The whole flock of the earth must be gathered together first, and only then will he roll the stone from our grave. Then we will receive his water for eternity. And we have the pleasure of singing that this is true along the way, until it is true. And it will become true, in part because we sing that it is true.

Luke Welch has a master’s degree from Covenant Seminary and preaches regularly in a conservative Anglican church in Maryland. He blogs about Bible structure at SUBTEXT. Follow him on Twitter: @lukeawelch
<>что такое интернет маркетинг

  1. That is, Passover and Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which was in all an 8 day combination of 4 feasts: 1) PASSOVER always fell on a numbered day of the month, but as such, it was not always on the same day of the week. The next seven days were the 2) FEAST OF UNLEAVENED BREAD. During that 8 day period would be a 3) SABBATH, and the next day would be the 4) FEAST OF FIRSTFRUITS. In the year Jesus was crucified and resurrected, Passover was on Friday, the Sabbath was on Saturday, and the Feast of Firstfruits was Sunday. Crucified on Passover, Raised on Firstfruits.  (back)

Read more

By In Theology

Jesus is coming soon if, by “soon,” you mean no sooner than 100,000 years in the future

no left behindI was getting my hair cut the other day by someone other than my wife, for a change. As a result I got exposed to Christian culture outside my own personal sociological safe room. I am ashamed to say how seldom this happens. Of course, by not “getting out more” I help other Christians form their own little bubbles of idiosyncratic belief and theological naivete.

But not this time. The barber learned, as he cut my hair, that I was a seminary graduate and had pastored in a number of places around the country. So, as he finished up shaving the back of my neck, he let loose with his camaraderie question: “Before I let you go, I have to ask you: Do you think the Lord is coming back soon!”

The sound of his voice alerted me this was, in his mind, a rhetorical question. We were supposed to share in the joy of the soon return of Jesus to earth.

I couldn’t come up with a way to evade his question, at least not in the half-second before hesitation on my part would get awkward. So I said it.

“No, I think we have at least another 100,000 years left.”

He expected not that.

But he should have. The only thing shocking about my claim is that I was giving such a low-ball number. The absolute minimum estimate should be 120,000 years from the time the Ten Commandments were given on Mount Sinai. There God wrote with his own finger.

You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of generations of those who love me and keep my commandments (Exodus 20).

Many English translations mute this because they leave out the second “generations.” It is true the word does not appear in the text after “thousands.” But it does not appear after “the third and the fourth” either. The reader has to read the implication. Third and fourth generation makes sense. But it makes no sense to then change the comparison to something else. God is promising to cut off wicked generations relatively quickly and bless the righteous for thousands of generation. The suffix is plural, not dual, so three generations is the absolute minimum here. A generation is forty years so:

40 x 3 x 1000 = 120,000

This idea is repeated elsewhere:

Know therefore that the Lord your God is God, the faithful God who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments, to a thousand generations, and repays to their face those who hate him, by destroying them. He will not be slack with one who hates him. He will repay him to his face (Deuternomy 7.9, 10).

Here we see the passage includes the word, “generations.” It only mentions one thousand of them, but it too contrasts this time span with the relatively quick destruction of the wicked.

So why do we expect the wicked to flourish and the number of generations of the righteous to remain small?

In fact, it is really strained to read the promise of faithfulness to “thousands” of generations as the minimal conceivable number of three. Why not eight thousands? Or twenty-four? Or more? It is possible that, just as God owns the cattle on more than a thousand hills (Psalm 50.10), so he will actually be faithful to many more generations of believers than merely thousands.

According to Paul, now that Jesus has come, there is to be an explosion of grace and salvation relative to the past.  As he writes in Romans 5:

Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned— for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.

But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.

Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous. Now the law came in to increase the trespass, but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, so that, as sin reigned in death, grace also might reign through righteousness leading to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

So when we read in Esther 8 about a world-wide vindication of God’s people resulting in massive proselytization “from India to Ethiopia,” we should realize that that was rather minimal compared to what is to happen now that Jesus has come and died and risen again. God says he is faithful to thousands of generations, which leaves us with 115 thousand years left.

So God says to expect thousands of generations, and we’ve spent a few generations claiming that we are the last one.  Paul writes that life through Jesus is more powerful than sin and death through Adam, and we preach that sin is universal and redemption only for a minority in history.

How does that honor what God says?

With this time frame in mind, I will leave you some of Jesus’ last words on earth:

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

See also:

<>способы размещения рекламы в интернете

Read more

By In Theology, Worship

Why Sing the Bible?

Back in July Pastor Uri Brito wrote a post on ten reasons to sing the psalms. My article is similar, but different enough that I thought it was worth posting. I sent this to my congregation last year as part of a longer article on singing in worship. Point number four is paraphrase of a section St. Athanansius’  letter to Marcellinus on the interpretation of the Psalms. It can be found as an appendix in his book On the Incarnation. 

The major tool God has given us to cultivate music that honors him is the songs in the Bible, including the Psalms. The Lord saw fit to give us one hundred and fifty psalms along with numerous other songs in the Scriptures, such as Exodus 15, I Samuel 2, Isaiah 12, 26, Luke 1:46-55 and the songs in Revelation. The Lord did not intend for us to sing only these songs, but He did intend for us to learn these songs and use them as the foundation for newer hymns. Without making the songs of Scripture a priority, our worship is guaranteed to be impotent. It is odd that the evangelical church says they love the Bible, but most refuse to sing it.  One of great tragedies of the modern church is that she has left the Bible as the first source of her songs.

As we learn the songs of Scripture we will reap several benefits. First, we will sing words and phrases we have never sung before. There are not many contemporary songs that say things like, “You have broken the teeth of the ungodly.” (Psalm 3:7) Or, “He shall have dominion from sea to sea.” (Psalm 72:8) Or, “They have shed the blood of saints and prophets and You have given them blood to drink. For it is their just due.” (Revelation 16:6). Often our language is influenced by movies, pop culture, or our friends. If we want our language to be shaped by Scripture then a good place to begin is the songs of Scripture.

Second, as we sing these songs we will be reminded that we have enemies and are engaged in a battle which only ends with Christ’s second coming. 137 out of 150 Psalms either explicitly or implicitly refer to enemies. Most of the songs in the New Testament have a similar theme. Look at Mary and Zacharias’ songs in Luke and the songs throughout Revelation. These are fight songs, songs of an army going out into the world to wage warfare and conquer for (and with) Christ.  Could it be that the Church is losing the battle because she does not even know she is in one? Singing Scripture will help rid of this amnesia.

Third, as we sing the songs of Zion we will find a great amount of variety. It is odd how many hymns and choruses sound the same both in tone and words. Scripture has similar themes, but these themes are expressed in an assortment of ways. There are short songs. (Psalm 117 and portions of Revelation) There are long songs. (Psalm 18 and 119)  There are songs of grief and pain. (Psalm 3 and 137) There are songs of great joy and gladness (Isaiah 26 and Mary’s Song in Luke 1) There are songs about God’s great majesty. (Exodus 15 and Psalm 111) There are songs about how men are supposed to live. (Psalm 1, 112, 128) There are songs with a repeating chorus. (Psalm 136) There are songs by Moses, Solomon, David, Hannah, Mary, Asaph, Isaiah, Zacharias and the angels.  We could go on and on. This means the songs in worship should have a variety of lengths, tones, and themes. Scriptures songs rightly done should never be boring.

Fourth, the songs of the Bible give us words for any situation we find ourselves in. And not just any words. We will have God’s word in our hearts and in our mouths. If we are sad let us sing Psalm 137. If we are joyful let us sing Psalm 150. If we are about to do our quiet times, let us sing a section of Psalm 119. If we are walking in nature let us sing Psalm 8 or 19. If we are considering Christ’s work on the cross let us sing Psalm 16 or 22. If we are rejoicing at the downfall of our enemies let us sing Exodus 15 or Psalm 7 or Revelation 11:17-18. If we have sinned let us sing Psalm 6 or 51. When we do this we are not just singing, but we are singing God’s Word. And His Word is sharper than any two edged sword, mighty to save, comforting for our souls, and strong to tear down the fortresses of Satan.

Finally, as we sing the songs of Scripture we will find a truly majestic and holy God who is also our Father. One of the perpetual problems in the Christian faith, a problem expressed in our songs, is that Christians tend to see God as either very far off or very near. The first group views God as unknowable. He becomes so holy that we can barely know him. The second group makes God in our image. He becomes too knowable, like a buddy on our back porch. The songs in Scripture balance out these themes. First, God is certainly holy. Isaiah 6 and Revelation 4:8 have the angels singing “Holy, Holy, Holy.” God is not our buddy who comes along to have chats with us as we meet with Him in prayer. He is a man of war. (Exodus 15) But God is also our Shepherd (Psalm 23), who remembers our frame, (Psalm 103:14) and is near to the broken hearted. (Psalm 34:18) As we learn the Psalms and other Scripture songs we get a balanced picture of God’s character, which can help us from sinking into error.<>цена продвинуть

Read more

By In Theology

Does God Care About Numbers?

church attendanceYes, he does.

Here is the prophecy he gave to Isaiah (chapter 49):

Listen to me, O coastlands,
and give attention, you peoples from afar.
The LORD called me from the womb,
from the body of my mother he named my name.
He made my mouth like a sharp sword;
in the shadow of his hand he hid me;
he made me a polished arrow;
in his quiver he hid me away.
And he said to me, “You are my servant,
Israel, in whom I will be glorified.”
But I said, “I have labored in vain;
I have spent my strength for nothing and vanity;
yet surely my right is with the Lord,
and my recompense with my God.”

And now the LORD says,
he who formed me from the womb to be his servant,
to bring Jacob back to him;
and that Israel might be gathered to him—
for I am honored in the eyes of the Lord,
and my God has become my strength—
he says:
It is too light a thing that you should be my servant
to raise up the tribes of Jacob
and to bring back the preserved of Israel;
I will make you as a light for the nations,
that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth.

It is “too light a thing,” too small a thing” (NASB) for God to save a tiny remnant. After all, he didn’t call Abram/Abraham for the sake of a tiny remnant:

Now the Lord said to Abram,

“Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” (Genesis 12:1-3, ESV)

Thus, from the first time God spoke to Abram, he identified himself as the god who justifies the ungodly–who saves the entire world.

How do Christians avoid acknowledging this plan for the spread of the Gospel and the conversion of the human race? They find quotations like:

And someone said to him, “Lord, will those who are saved be few?” And he said to them, “Strive to enter through the narrow door. For many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able. When once the master of the house has risen and shut the door, and you begin to stand outside and to knock at the door, saying, ‘Lord, open to us,’ then he will answer you, ‘I do not know where you come from.’ (Luke 13:23-25, ESV)

But this is not a reasonable application of what Jesus says. Jesus does not say that only few will be saved in all world history. He says that salvation is going to spread to the nations but that his own generation of fellow Israelites are in danger of being, uh, left behind.

He went on his way through towns and villages, teaching and journeying toward Jerusalem. And someone said to him, “Lord, will those who are saved be few?” And he said to them, “Strive to enter through the narrow door. For many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able. When once the master of the house has risen and shut the door, and you begin to stand outside and to knock at the door, saying, ‘Lord, open to us,’ then he will answer you, ‘I do not know where you come from.’ Then you will begin to say, ‘We ate and drank in your presence, and you taught in our streets.’ But he will say, ‘I tell you, I do not know where you come from. Depart from me, all you workers of evil!’ In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when you see Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets in the kingdom of God but you yourselves cast out. And people will come from east and west, and from north and south, and recline at table in the kingdom of God. And behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last.” (Luke 13:22-30, ESV)

People will be gathered at the Table of the Lord from all points of the compass, but many who witnessed Jesus during his ministry are rejecting his message.

I submit that all remnant passages are of this nature. The majority rejects but the ones who repent and believe are the seed of a great multitude. Worldwide salvation follows from the crisis and judgment. Jesus’ own parables about seed and mustard seed and leaven teach this expectation.

Many people think it is shallow and superficial to “worry about numbers.” But obviously God is not shallow and superficial. Yet he would not tell us of “a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages” (Revelation 7.9) if he had no concern for quantity.

Of course, they probably get the idea because some Christians who worry about numbers seem shallow and superficial. I agree–for many contexts in the Christian life but not all. Furthermore, identifying oneself with the “few who are chosen” can be just as shallow and superficial. People who act as it if is a matter of piety to be satisfied with a world going to hell because their small group is elect of God are not people who are obedient to the Great Commission. The Great Commission, I submit, cannot be obeyed by people who don’t believe it is possible:

And Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and disciple of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”

The real reason I think some Christians are shallow in their numbers-fixation is because they have self-glorification goals corrupting their desire for the kingdom and/or they don’t really believe the Great Commission is about discipling all nations and training them to obey Jesus. Instead they believe the Great Commission is about getting professions of faith and then training them to get other professions of faith. That, while better than nothing, will tend to produce shallow Christians.

But the fact that God wants a countless number of trained disciples rather than a countless number of ignorant professing believers doesn’t give us any reason to think God doesn’t care about numbers. Concern for quality does not eliminate concern about quantity.

Accepting this basic Biblical mission probably won’t change as much as I would like it to change. God’s providence and timing are still a mystery. Once you believe in what God wants for history, you may, in fact, find you are now frustrated by the lack of results you see in your own place and time.

But it is good to be frustrated. That is the Spirit praying for you to God to end the discrepancy between how things are and how they should be (8.26). Anyone who reads the promises of God and is not frustrated when he looks around at his life and world is not reading carefully. Better to be frustrated than satisfied with a situation so far from what God has revealed he intends to bring about.

Sometimes we are sent to plant and sometimes to harvest (John 4.35-38). If you are sent to a time of planting, you might not see the fruit you long for. But that doesn’t mean it is not coming.

But we have this treasure in jars of clay, to show that the surpassing power belongs to God and not to us. We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed; always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be manifested in our bodies. For we who live are always being given over to death for Jesus’ sake, so that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh. So death is at work in us, but life in you. (2 Corinthians 4:7-12, ESV)

One implication of this is you never have a right to consider your work for the Great Commission a failure. God does not promise a great rescue–Jesus has already done that part of the story. God promises to use your labors. He promises to accept your works just as he accepts you in Christ. He promises to say, “Well done.” So nothing was ever wasted. The seed vanishes and is forgotten and then later the tree grows. Most people will not notice the cause for the effect. Their eyes will be on the cause and effect relationships that are in close enough proximity to notice. But God never forgets. And he promises that nothing is without effect.

For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written:

Death is swallowed up in victory.
O death, where is your victory?
O death, where is your sting?

The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, my beloved brothers, be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain. (1 Corinthians 15:53-58, ESV)

<>вакансии копирайтерасоздание интернет а цена

Read more

By In Theology

Are We Blessing, Cursing, or Neither? Is “Neither” Even Possible? – Part 1

“Out of the same mouth proceed blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not to be.” James 3:10

My question: “Are we blessing, cursing, or neither? Is the “neither” category even possible?”

Most Christians take special care to abstain from vulgarities and blasphemies. Vulgarities often put private matters on public display, such as bathroom or bedroom activities, which ought to remain private rather than becoming coffee-break humor or hammer-meets-thumb expletives.  Everyone knows what happens in the bathroom, but you’re supposed to leave it there, not bring it out with you. Everyone knows what happens in the bedroom, besides sleeping, but that is also meant to be a private matter. It is supposed to happen “off-stage.” Blasphemies, of course, take God’s name and use it in a less than hallowed manner. Number 3 on the Top 10, declares, “He will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.” (Ex. 20:7) If you had to choose one, then bring your filth out of the bathroom with you before you use God’s name carelessly or worse yet, pejoratively. However, when you do choose, choose to keep what’s private private and what’s holy holy. Vulgarities and blasphemies can hardly be considered blessings.

Another verbal matter to be considered is the direct curse. The word “damn” has a specific purpose. This is not a word that cannot be appropriately used, but it is one that commonly gets misused, and overly misused, in our culture, often preceded by a blasphemy as to Who is being called upon to do the damning. We teach our children that it is not our place to condemn someone else to eternal perdition, nor should it be our desire to do so. “Damn” and “hell” are neither vulgar nor blasphemous; rather they are words that ought not be tossed around.

So we abstain from careless speech, coarse jokes, and flippant curses. Now what? Are we to assume that refraining from a short list of words and phrases means that we are controlling our tongue? That we are blessing our brother?

While there are no neutral words, no words that don’t convey what’s going on in our hearts, there is a difference between words spoken with an implied blessing and those spoken with an overt blessing.  An implied blessing could be contained in the simple, “Good morning,” depending on one’s inflection. This can also be an overt blessing depending on you inflection, like “Good morning!”  This can also be a curse if said too loudly, too early. (Prov. 27:14) There can also be implied blessing in casual conversations. The mere fact that you take the time to speak to someone can mean more to them than you’ll ever know. That sounds sappy and cliché, but that doesn’t make it untrue. Even if you have nothing in common with the person except the current weather, there can be a blessing in making small talk.

Every sentence we say can be used as an implied blessing, but are we willing to go further than this? Are we willing to take the effort that it takes to use our words for overt blessings; blessings that would be hard to be mistaken as anything else? Are we willing to take our eyes off of ourselves and our personal problems in order to be an overt blessing to those around us today?

However, before we have something profitable to say, we must be aware of what’s going on around us. Wisdom is contextual, so wise words are typically only wise if spoken in due season. This requires listening before we speak. Listening takes effort and time. Listening means getting down off our soap boxes and actually considering what the other person is saying. We can view every conversation today as an opportunity to take our eyes off of ourselves, shut our mouths for a minute or two, and listen to our neighbor. Then, and only then, can we overtly bless them.

We can’t heal diseases with our spoken word, but we can speak words seasoned with salt. We can’t feed the multitudes with one order of fish and chips, but we can buy someone lunch and then let them do the talking. If we actually listen, maybe we’ll actually have something to say that matters.

More on overt blessings later…<>поисковое продвижение а топ

Read more