The Japan Times OnLine, Hiroaki Sato, offers a Japanese perspective on Pearl Harbor and he claims non-interventionism is right on most cases. He summarizes Buchanan’s piece:
Patrick Buchanan, the presidential candidate in 2000, has been dismissed as a credible polemicist and politician for some years now largely because of his “anti-interventionist” or isolationist stance. But I do not see much harm in nonintervention in most instances. Do you?
<>