Law
Tag Archive

By In History, Theology

The Reformed Doctrine of the Necessity of Good Works

When the average Evangelical Christian talks about being “saved” he usually refers to the first moment of conversion, or justification by faith in Christ. He tends to reduce salvation to a past event in the believer’s life: “For by grace you have been saved through faith” (Eph. 2:8). From this perspective, salvation is something that has already been accomplished.

But this perspective is myopic. The Bible paints a far richer picture, presenting salvation as an ongoing journey that culminates in the future. Believers have been saved, are being saved, and will be saved on the Last Day: “And the Lord added to the church daily those who are being saved” (Acts 2:47); “But he who endures to the end shall be saved” (Mt. 24:13).

(more…)

Read more

By In Culture, Sexuality

The LGBTQ Cult And The 6th Commandment

THE BIBLICAL COMMAND FOR LIFE

At the foot of Mt. Sinai, God handed down to Moses, on two stone tablets, the Ten Commandments, which would form the basis of all Biblical law and societal ethics from that point forward. The Sixth Commandment, “Thou shalt not kill,” stands as an unambiguous defense of life. It condemns murder, yes and amen, but its scope extends far beyond the apparent sins like serial killing and suicide bombing. It also denounces any kind of action that undermines the sanctity of human life or promotes a culture of death, including behaviors and ideologies that stifle the production of future generations in the womb. If the womb of a woman was to be fruitful and multiply with her husband, any action that robs fruit from the womb of a woman is akin to a kind of killing. Not just killing the actual children of her womb, which is undoubtedly the case in abortion. But also in destroying the potential fruit from her womb, engaging in behaviors that shrivel and prevent her from bringing new life into the world, which today are legion.

For instance, homosexuality, lesbianism, and transgenderism are more than mere deviations from Biblical sexual ethics; they are direct violations of the Sixth Commandment. These practices, under the guise of love and identity, tragically result in the killing of future generations by engaging in fruitless sexual unions and surgeries that mutilate the body God has fearfully and wonderfully made.

MURDERING FROM BARREN UNIONS

When two men or two women come together, their union is intrinsically sterile. This sterility is not only biological but profoundly spiritual, as it defies God’s design for human sexuality. In Genesis, God commands humanity to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28). Homosexuality and lesbianism reject this divine mandate, choosing instead a barren path of emptiness and void. Every act of homosexual or lesbian sex is a deliberate choice against the potential life that heterosexual unions naturally produce. It is a silent yet profound killing of the unborn, future generations, legacy, and a denying of the very possibility of future life to come from bodies committed to death. Homosexuality is not only about the unholy use and practice of your genitals, it is the implementation of pure unadulterated selfishness, to rob the future of life to enjoy a commitment in the present to death.

MURDERING IN MULTILATED SELFISHNESS

Transgenderism, with its invasive surgeries and hormone treatments, takes this violation a step further. It not only prevents the natural procreation process but also destroys the God-given body, crafted with a specific purpose. These actions are the epitome of societal selfishness, where personal desires are placed above the natural law and the greater good of humanity. The surgeries that render a person infertile or the hormonal treatments that disrupt natural biological processes are acts of violence against God’s creation, ensuring that no future generations can come forth from such mutilated bodies.

A GENERATION ADDICTED TO DEATH

The LGBTQ movement’s refusal to populate society with sexually healthy and moral citizens, as commanded by Scripture, is one the greatest act of societal selfishness imaginable. Rather than embracing the blessing of children, the movement celebrates death, and only stays alive by perverting the offspring of the heterosexual unions they detest and reject. They rely on the very system they abhor to continue propagating their ideology, like a parasite who cannot live without the life of the host, their dependence on the fruit of our wombs highlights the utter emptiness of their lifestyle.

By refusing to bring forth life, they not only violate the Sixth Commandment but also contribute to a culture of death, where the value of life is diminished, and the sanctity of procreation is discarded. They perpetuate a legacy not of life and godliness but of barrenness, all-out rebellion against God’s design, and stand ready to receive the awful judgment that God has been patiently and mercifully withholding.

A CALL TOWARD THE REVIVAL OF LIFE

As Christians, we must be people who stand for life. Life in the womb, life that comes from covenant marriages, and we must stand against anything that stands in the way of that. From the policies that promote death written by politicians who are the grandchildren of eugenicists to defending the Sixth Commandment in all its fullness, we must advocate for the sanctity of life in every form, from the womb to natural death, and reject any ideology or practice that undermines this sacred principle. Our society’s future depends on our willingness to populate it with godly, moral people and to speak the truth against the culture of death.

As the culture around us swims in its own filth, reveling in death, let us be places where vibrant living and the production of life occur. And may our joy and jubilant love for God and His creation become so infectious that all who are addicted to death will come home to the God of life, embracing life in Christ, repenting of deathlike living, and helping us kill the culture of death forever.

Read more

By In Theology

Meditating on God’s Law

Imagine a lawyer sitting down to write about the laws of the United States.  She knows it is an impossibly broad task to sum up the vast expanse of federal law, but she wants to express to the reader that the laws of the United States are, in the main, right and just.  Suppose also, that she chooses to address her writing to the “United States” personified, and she writes in the mode of a modern panegyric. 

Even under these eccentric circumstances, can we imagine her writing something like, “Oh that my ways may be steadfast in keeping your statutes! Then I shall not be put to shame, having my eyes fixed on all your commandments . . . With my lips I declare all the rules of your mouth.  In the ways of your testimonies I delight as much as in all riches.  I will meditate on your precepts and fix my eyes on your ways.  I will delight in your statutes; I will not forget your word . . . Open my eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of your law”?  (Psalm 119:5-6, 13-16, 18).

 If she did, she would feel very alone if she had done much reading in her subject.  Many legal treatises and law journal articles have passed dully over my eyes and none of them extol the law in this way.  Even lawmakers, when they’re introducing a bill they’re sponsoring, do not speak of their proposed law in such terms.  The most enthusiastic supporter of civil rights would not praise the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in this way.  At their best, such laws are expedient, or practical, or groundbreaking, or necessary.  They are never wondrous, wonderful, sure, true, or righteous. 

(more…)

Read more