Read Part 1, Part 2
By Joel Nelson, Guest Series
Christian
Liberty and Witness to the World
Scripture teaches that even as much as something may be permitted within the context of Christian liberty, it is not always wise or profitable to exercise that liberty. Galatians 5:13-14 teaches, “…Do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’” And four times in Paul’s first epistle to the Corinthians he writes, “All things are lawful for me, but…” Even though permitted, there are times where it does not build up, edify, or show love to a neighbor by exercising a particular freedom. Is the freedom to conduct civil disobedience in this case, by worshiping as a physical, corporate body (as opposed to scattered individuals and families joined only in a spiritual or technological sense) a situation where it is permissible, but not profitable due to the potential negative witness or “stumbling block” to nonchristian neighbors and passers-by?
To properly address this concern, we must
begin with what is clear and then progress to interpreting wisely the unclear.
The clear command is not to neglect to meet together, per Hebrews 10:24-25: “And
let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting
to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all
the more as you see the Day drawing near.” This command was given in the face
of war and impending distress. And this is not an isolated, one-off command
that is only applicable in this context, but rather the instruction throughout
the Old and New Testament to the covenant community.[i]
“Death
Has Lost Its Sting”
Can these commands to meet together as a
community be set aside for an undefined, but limited time, such as for the
plague or a pandemic or even a viral outbreak with an all-ages case fatality
rate far under one percent? There are arguably instances where there would be
wisdom in considering the option of temporarily doing so— as long as all
ministry activities were not suspended. The historical record of the church, including
the writings of many of the Protestant Reformers, does give precedent for this.
But these measures should be temporary, with a clear end, and reserved for
truly dangerous circumstances. It is one thing to consider whether to “go
aside” for a time to avoid waves of plague with a death rate of over 30%, but
another matter entirely to also do so for recurring seasonal viruses. As
previously noted in this essay, during severe plagues many pastors, bishops,
deacons, and even Christian laypeople did not go into hiding but rather
displayed remarkable courage in the face of death. The basis for such courage
is the resurrection of Jesus Christ: because of the resurrection, death has
lost its sting (1 Cor. 15:55). As the apostle Paul wrote, if there is no
resurrection— if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain, our
faith is in vain— then we are of all people most to be pitied (1 Cor.
15:14-19). But since Christ has in fact been raised from the dead as the
firstfruits, then the eventual destruction of death is certain (1 Cor.
15:20-26). It is this confidence that has given Christians the courage to face
lions, hostile kings, persecution, plagues, and more throughout history. Death
is not the ultimate end for those who belong to Christ.
As Paul wrote to the Corinthians, Jesus
“must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. The last enemy to
be destroyed is death” (1 Cor. 15:25-26). The Biblical record is clear that the
resurrected Christ has overcome death and will destroy death, and Christians
have the confidence that this will happen. But modern societies do not have the
confidence that this will happen. Kimbell Kornu has noted that modern medicine
is thus attempting to overcome death by the scientific method, by exalting
man’s domination over nature until man himself becomes the final object of
dominion (Theopolis Conversations, May 2020). Exhibiting this lack of
confidence, when reminded of the risk of death, of man’s fragility, even kings
and rulers cower and hide. In the face of this fear, many of mankind’s
terrified responses end up resembling little more than pagan rituals, technologically-advanced
versions of rain dances until rain finally falls, self-flagellation until the
pestilence ends, sacrificing the weakest so that victory over an invading tribe
may be won, or wearing talisman objects until the harvest is safely brought in.
The viral outbreak of 2020 has revealed the primal terrors of an unconverted
world, whose technological and scientific advances were supposed to be its lord
and savior but whose gods failed. It is as C.S. Lewis warned: each new power
won by man is a power over man as well. Like the Midianite army before Gideon’s
300 men, terror incites men to attack the one thing they still have some
semblance of power over: other men.
(more…)
Read more